The ruling dashed, at least for now, the plans of The Onion’s parent company to take over Infowars and radically shift its content.

A bankruptcy judge on Tuesday rejected a bid by The Onion’s parent company to buy Alex Jones’ far-right media empire, including the website Infowars, ruling that the auction process was unfair.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez said after a two-day hearing that The Onion’s parent company, Global Tetrahedron, had not submitted the best bid and was wrongly named the winner of an auction last month by a court-appointed trustee.

“I don’t think it’s enough money,” Lopez said in a late-night ruling from the bench in a Houston court. “I’m going to not approve the sale.”

  • NutWrench@lemmy.mlEnglish
    811·
    11 days ago

    “I don’t think it’s enough money,” Lopez said in a late-night ruling from the bench in a Houston court. “I’m going to not approve the sale.”

    Who gives a shit if “you don’t think it’s enough money.” An offer was made by The Onion and accepted by the seller. What YOU want has fark-all to do with anything.

    • HeyJoe@lemmy.worldEnglish
      131·
      11 days ago

      Wouldn’t the sale of the company go directly to what he owes the people? If so I doubt the seller cares what it’s sold for, but the judge may think it’s unfair to settle that low so that the people can get more possibly? I also could be wrong and that’s not were the money goes? Just seemed like that’s what this is for. I doubt they will get much more after things are sold either.

  • Susaga@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    721·
    11 days ago

    This is the most upsetting, and most literal, instance of “not the onion”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
    7318·
    11 days ago

    Obviously bullshit…

    They made the highest bid, no one else bid higher.

    The judge said they should have tried to get Alex Jones to make an even higher offer…

    And since they didn’t, it somehow means Alex Jones owns it still and is already broadcasting?

    The US legal system is a fucking joke.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
      44·
      11 days ago

      They made the highest bid, no one else bid higher.

      That’s not entirely true. If you read the article, that’s just not what it says.

      I hope the Onion has the resources to genuinely outbid. Perhaps they could accept crowdfunding donations to reach the amount if necessary?

      Here’s Legal Eagle on this particular case, incidentally:

      https://youtu.be/GmDNz7irGgw

    • Kalkaline @leminal.spaceEnglish
      93·
      11 days ago

      They should just take all his assets and garnish any payment to him so he’s got 0 wealth to his name and is forced to live on minimum wage.

  • als@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    195·
    11 days ago

    If they put the biggest bid in then surely it’s enough money? How come some random guy gets to decide not 🥴the free market🥴

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      27·
      11 days ago

      They didn’t put in the biggest bid. They put in a bid that was a smaller amount of cash bundled with a waiver from the Sandyhook families that were to get a damages payout that they forgo their damages claim.

      The third party evaluating the bids decided this was a better deal for Infowars’ creditors, as that meant more of the bankruptcy money would be going to them, so that’s why it was chosen.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyzEnglish
    8·
    11 days ago

    They used sealed bids, that’s okay when the value of something is known, but for a “one of a kind” conspiracy theory website that doesn’t seem like the best method to me.

  • intensely_human@lemm.eeEnglish
    1·
    10 days ago

    Interesting that there’s a whole community for questions that can be answered with “Not The Onion”