Didn’t Luigi have something to say about that?
- 0 Posts
- 18 Comments
fodor@lemmy.zipto World News@lemmy.world•Japanese queue for hours as rice shortage deepensEnglish1·2 days agoThe average consumer doesn’t care about that aspect though.
fodor@lemmy.zipto World News@lemmy.world•Japanese queue for hours as rice shortage deepensEnglish3·2 days agoThey do, of course. There’s plenty of rice of other kinds.
That is partly true, but also he’s a strong narcissist. They make up their own stories. They’ll play up the feud to take eyes off of other bad shit.
Don’t think for a second he lost or he’s gone or it’s all over for him. He doesn’t see it that way.
fodor@lemmy.zipto News@lemmy.world•Trump preparing large-scale cancellation of federal funding for California, sources say53·3 days agoThere are other comments that already give practical ways to accomplish what you say is impossible.
fodor@lemmy.zipto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Why is DOGE still around if Donny and Elon aren't getting along?20·3 days agoThe federal government lawyers have said in court that Elon Musk was not the leader of that organization. Therefore, the fact that he said he has departed from Washington would not affect that organization.
Of course we know that he was leading it, and the president has said as much, and the above claims are all being contested in court by quoting the president. But anyway, if you want the official answer, now you have it.
But the official answer also changes over time. Because if Musk was not the leader of that group, then many of the actions that he claimed to take and many of the actions that people attributed to him would now be actions of a private individual, which would expose him to massive civil liability. Therefore, we can be sure that the government’s lawyers will continue to change their story about when and where and how he worked for the government.
Definitions are important, but you don’t get to unilaterally choose them. Depending on the person you’re talking to, sometimes it’s more effective to ask them to define the terms first, or to ask them which dictionary they prefer.
So depending on the situation, it might be more beneficial to bring in the quotes from various Israeli leaders about how they’re trying to get Palestinians gone, and how they’re happy with Palestinian death, and then bring in those graphs that show the numbers of the dead, and ask whether they think that’s acceptable.
Another way to think about it is that sometimes questions of definition can distract us from questions of morality, and if the person that you’re trying to talk to is running away from the issue. By doing so, you can reasonably adjust your focus back to the facts.
fodor@lemmy.zipto Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world•If your first thought is what you're conditioned to think, maybe you can't access your "defining" thoughts when you're drunk.English2·3 days agoI’m not following you. What you think and what you say or do are entirely different, right? We think all kinds of things very quickly about all kinds of topics, and just as a practical measure we can only say or do do a small fraction of those.
So right now I’m not seeing the Mel Gibson connection, because that was a claim about his actions.
fodor@lemmy.zipto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•What are the benefits of a server having multiple public IP addresses?English4·3 days agoExactly. Reverse DNS lookup matters in some situations.
fodor@lemmy.zipto Technology@lemmy.world•We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and StarlinkEnglish3·3 days agoThat’s true but it doesn’t solve the problem now.
fodor@lemmy.zipto World News@lemmy.world•Russia offers political asylum to Elon Musk over Trump feudEnglish13·3 days agoIf Musk actually does go to Russia, then I think any of his American investments will be up for grabs. That would be quite entertaining.
fodor@lemmy.zipto World News@lemmy.world•Russia offers political asylum to Elon Musk over Trump feudEnglish11·3 days agoYes, very publicly, but remember that they lie about everything anyway. So it’s not like the world is a better place because two pieces of s*** are insulting each other in front of the world. They could fight today and work together next week if they think it’ll get them more power and money, because that’s all they live for.
fodor@lemmy.zipto Technology@lemmy.world•Self-hosting your own media considered harmful - I just received my second community guidelines violation for my video demonstrating the use of LibreELEC on a Raspberry Pi 5, for 4K video playbackEnglish1·3 days agoI think what you mean to say is that we should be pressuring public officials to try to bust up Google’s monopoly on many things. And we are doing that, and it is showing some progress. But there is much more work to be done.
fodor@lemmy.zipto Technology@lemmy.world•Self-hosting your own media considered harmful - I just received my second community guidelines violation for my video demonstrating the use of LibreELEC on a Raspberry Pi 5, for 4K video playbackEnglish34·3 days agoYouTube took down the video because of its own policies, not because of copyright law. So we should be blaming YouTube.
I think it’s easy to see exactly why if you consider how YouTube treats small content creators. If I post a video and companies claim copyright on it, the video gets demonetized and I might lose my account. I can respond and contest the claim and maybe I can win but I still lost money in the meantime, and perhaps more significantly, the companies that made their copyright claims will never face a consequence for attempting to burn my channel. In other words, if I get things wrong a few times I’ll lose my channel and my income source, but if they get things wrong a million times, they face zero consequence.
And you might be inclined to blame the media companies. But again, this is YouTube doing what YouTube wants to do of its own volition, and not something that’s required by law. If YouTube valued small-scale content creators and end users, it would create different policies.
It’s certainly true that the system is broken, but at the same time you’re suggesting we should forgive HR employees for the bad stuff they do, and I don’t think that’s how morality works.
Not only that, we all understand that sometimes employees don’t have control of a situation and they’re going to follow company policy or go along with their bosses. But we can see through their words and their body language how they feel about it, and we can recognize small actions that they could take to make a bad situation slightly less bad. In my experience it’s very rare that you will encounter such behavior in HR, because the vast majority of HR workers are perfectly happy to f*** us over as much as they can.
Last year I was talking with a veteran coworker who was worried about where the company was going to end up in 10 years, but my contract ends in a year and will not be renewed. I told her openly, they’re not paying me to think about 10 years from now, they’re paying me to make the next year a good year, and I don’t really care about the long-term future cuz I won’t be here. She was furious, but she wasn’t furious enough to go get me a long-term contract. I think she never saw the hypocrisy; even today she still thinks that I’m a bad worker.
fodor@lemmy.zipto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Why is having a lawyer present during police interviews "opt in" rather than "opt out"?3·3 days agoOf course what you wrote is not what it actually says in the Bill of Rights.
I’m not worried about the hypocrisy here. I couldn’t give a f*** about Trump being hypocritical. But I care an awful lot that he’s threatening to do something terrible to someone he considers a political opponent.