- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Why is it that every time there’s drama about hardware, its something I own?
That’s because of monopolies… There are only two brands of PC CPUs you could own…
Oh how I miss Cyrix
That’s a duopoly and is also not true, there are ARM processors readily available outside of Intel and AMD.
Well, this happens to affect the Ryzen 5 3600, which I’m pretty sure is one of AMD’s most popular processors ever…so you’re certainly not alone.
Linux has a merged mitigation so when the new kernel comes out Linux users will be safe
when the new kernel comes out Linux users will be safe
It’s going to take a lot longer than that for most distros to move to latest upstream. This specific fix might be pulled in as a hotfix if you’re lucky, but it still takes time. The latest Ubuntu LTS is on 5.15, for example, which was released in October 2021. Debian Bookworm, which just released last month, uses 6.1 from December 2022.
Thank goodness I’m on arch (btw).
Critical security fixes are backported. There where a lot of kernels released yesterday that had the fix. For 5.15, 5.15.122 was released with the zenbleed mitigation.
Looks like I’m getting the final kick to Linux on my main gaming PC.
Highly recommend Pop OS! It’s been very reliable. I haven’t had anything this steady since Mac OS when I was just doing programming. I tried to go from Mac to Alienware for personal computing and it was terrible, windows blue screened almost once a week if not once every four days.
Switched to Pop OS, enabled Proton in steams preferences for gaming, and it was completely steady. Only thing that doesn’t work is the hibernate. Which isn’t a super big deal to me.
I’d actually say everything has been a better experience than windows. Lutris and pop store have a large variety of games and apps. For example lutris supports GOG and probably epic games. It feels like it’s everything I’d want without the shitty user interfaces and lack of crashes.
on my main gaming PC
good luck with that
I know it’s not the best, but Proton has come a long, long way. I can play D4, Monster Hunter, factorio, lots of stuff.
It is really fantastic. With steam almost all the games i bother playing just works. Deleted the windows partition years ago.
Just have to check the community forum how well it works before buying. Or just get a refund if it does not work.I’ve been testing the waters with my steam deck. There are some hiccups, but almost everything I want to play can be done with proton.
I know it’s not the best
Didn’t pay thousands for top of the line ryzen and nvidia gear for “not the best” gaming situation.
Linux falls short on two major fronts, less idiot proof, less gamer friendly, and that’s Windows’ largest market shares, idiots and gamers.
If you use this guide to mount the Windows drives you can run it and Linux side by side. It works just as good as Windows these days for 90% of games. You can add games downloaded from unofficial sites to Steam as a “Non-steam game” and it works. Installing Nvidia drivers on Mint is easier than Windows, there’s a built in utility.
Do you know if that works for epic games and heroic launcher as well?
There’s another launcher that I’m forgetting the name of that will launch Epic and GoG games. Following that proton guide should make NTFS (windows) drives usable for anything in Linux though. I can boot games downloaded from “alternate sites” if I add them to steam as “non steam games” regardless of how the drive is mounted.
Planned fix
December 2023
Yikes.
It’s worth noting these are the firmware / microcode fixes.
There’s already a software solution available,
There is a software workaround, you can set the chicken bit DE_CFG[9]. This may have some performance cost, and the microcode update is preferred.
source: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/24/3
AMD has also already released a fix for the big boy - the EPYC processor.
The MSR bit is potentially a large performance loss and AMD recommends their partners not use it. In my tests is was 5-15% on EPYC depending on workload. “Some performance cost” is really hiding the reality of that bit.
The article says it’s exploitable via javascript on a random web page. I don’t see how that could be possible
Removed by mod
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=V_9cQP60ZGI
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Intel had something like this as well (side channel attack?). I remember it because Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux kernel) ripped Intel a new one.
They’ve had a couple. Spectre is the one to which you’re referring, I bet.
affects all Zen 2-based Ryzen, Threadripper, and EPYC CPUs
I know they’re probably pretty common, all my stuff ended up being Zen 3. Here’s hoping they don’t find similar issues in later generations.
I’ve got an older 3900X that’s Zen 2, but I’m otherwise clear, too.
It’s kind of hard to figure out which Zen # a CPU falls under, so here’s the Wiki page listing all Zen 2 CPUs.
ELI5 how this works?
The guys themselves made a pretty good write-up. https://lock.cmpxchg8b.com/zenbleed.html
The short version is that the very large registers on the modern CPUs aren’t fixed things like they used to be, they’re allocated from some register area on the die. When they “zero” the upper portion of one of the large registers it doesn’t really clear it. It just releases the block back to available.
Another thing all CPUs need these days to keep fast is branch prediction. CPUs are only fast if they can keep the pipeline of upcoming commands (opcodes) to process full. So they often run both possible routes for a branch and discard the loser.
In this case they “trick” the CPU by asking it to “clear” a block of one of these large registers (the upper half). But then have the branch go the other way. What sometimes happens is that the register space is “released” but it has to take it back. In some specific circumstances they are able to have the register come back, but not with the original contents but with some random contents of maybe another register that was used by another thread (maybe even running on a different VM guest).
I have a server with a 3000 series CPU. I can confirm this definitely works. You’ll get all kind of random blocks of memory from processes running as all users (and kernel code). For AMD processors running VM servers it is even worse. Because if you have say a VPS running on an AMD Zen2 CPU, you can login as any user run this and get random data from people on other VPS on the same hardware!
There is a linux workaround, and it seems most CPUs will be fixed by December.
Note: If you have access to a VPS that is vulnerable, do note that in most countries it is illegal to even try to exploit this.
I’m just going to pretend I didn’t buy any AMD surface laptops.
How come branch prediction seems so vulnerable to exploits? Both spectre and meltdown were also caused by branch prediction not working quite right.
It wasn’t branch prediction alone, it was the cache combined with branch prediction. The problem is that even discarded outcomes fill the cache with data. Those older vulnerabilities also had the problem that the access permissions check was done after the branch prediction. It’s probably too expensive to do when it’s not even clear yet whether the branch is going to be taken (that’s just speculation on my part though).
The more steps in the instruction pipeline the more ways there are for there to be an error where some result doesn’t get erased when undoing stuff from the wrong branch. It’s basically like telling someone to move into a new house and get settled then stopping them six hours in and trying to make sure you get all their stuff out.
Oh poop.
Nice to know that security researchers are giving AMD some love too. Ill be sure to turn the patch off on my 3600 once it rolls around (can’t be losing any frames for something silly like security)
That’s a very bad idea.
The bad news is that the exploit doesn’t require physical hardware access and can be triggered by loading JavaScript on a malicious website.
Is there any information on the performance impact of the microcode fix or is it too early for that?
So far the word is the microcode fix causes negligible performance impact, but using the MSR fix causes 5-15% loss. In my own testing on EPYC hardware, microcode made no noticable difference to my workloads and benchmarks. Same as random noise in results.
This is pretty bad but it needs local access to a server/workstation as well as pretty sophisticated knowledge/tools to exploit. Even then there’s no guarantee of getting any relevant information out of it. Anything with frequent enough logins/hashes going through the local system is probably a server someplace, and if its important you should have it physically locked away and access controlled.
Exploit is usable via JavaScript. Does not require local access.
Is there any evidence that the exploit works in a browser? A few comments on the article suggested that the Javascript engines in browsers protect against timing attacks like these.
