• nomous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      That’s your takeaway? That we’re all be exploited so the person who has to deal with the scams should just be OK with it because we’re all on some hypothetical side?

      • ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        I mean unless that person is explicitly getting paid to deal with scams, why give a shit? If I found out someone was gaming the system where I worked at I’d ask how they did it, because fuck the corporation.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          unless that person is explicitly getting paid to deal with scams

          In this context it was their job to deal with the scammer.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Because it was costing all the minimum wage employees in the store money. They literally told you exactly why they gave a shit.