• Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Also there’s a “love” that’s prevalent among the affluent that isn’t love at all.

    Where children are seen more as and expected to fill the role as familial assets of the patriarch, more an extension of the parent’s legacy. No appreciation for the kids themselves as individuals, but attempted clones of the parents, and met with disdain when they fail to fill that mold as a failed investment.

    The Trumps and Murdochs come to mind, and among extreme wealth, thats the rule not the exception.

    It’s not contempt at the outset or disinterest, they see their children as assets, no different than stock or capital, to play to increase the reach of THEIR leverage, even after they’re dead.

    As a parent, I have a great deal of contempt for parents that expect their kids to further their own interests or expect/demand they become little clones of them.

    Kids don’t owe you shit, you owe them.