☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agoPride Versioninglemmy.mlimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down13
arrow-up1516arrow-down1imagePride Versioninglemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 hours agoeither have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 hours agoDate based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y). At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.
either have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
Date based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y).
At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.