• WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is just cope. They did give the OK. They didn’t technically say he could revoke birthright citizenship, but they removed the ability for people to effectively challenge the revocation of their citizenship. If you can’t actually exercise your rights, then your rights don’t exist.

    But keep huffing the copium.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Please explain how they removed the ability to challenge it.

      Also, they are still going to make a decision. Just haven’t done it yet.

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I asked you first. So annoying.

          Here ya go: The ruling is against universal injunctions. Any existing injunctions stay and any future plaintiffs can block the order as well. It just can’t be stopped across the country from any existing or future rulings. Unless of course the Supreme Court ends up saying it’s unconstitutional.

          Your turn.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            And you don’t see the blindingly obvious problems with that, the issues that have been repeatedly pointed out in dozens of articles on the subject? I’m sorry, but you just aren’t operating in good faith. You’re either willfully ignoring those issues, or you are demanding others do your homework for you.

            • venusaur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              So you don’t have an answer to my question? Sounds like you’re the one operating blindly. Just saying things.

                  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Look, I don’t know why you have such piss-poor critical thinking skills and a complete lack of any ability to read the voluminous coverage on the subject.

                    But the entire reason Trump wanted this ruling was because it would make it easier to trample people’s rights. Without national injunctions, your rights do not exist. This is especially true for immigration. The Trump admin is also fighting to be able to deport people without due process, and you’re already not entitled to representation during immigration procedures.

                    What portion of immigrants can afford a lawyer? If you’re a low-income US citizen, and Trump decides to revoke your citizenship, what exactly is your plan? Yes, you have citizenship from birth, but that doesn’t matter. Trump has decided to just fucking ignore the Constitution entirely. And yes, in theory, you can sue the admin in court, but good luck with that. If you can even afford a lawyer, by the time you find one, you’ll already be on a plane to Sudan.

                    How are you so dense that you can’t realize that the entire point of Trump pursuing this is that he wants to remove from people the ability to challenge his illegal actions? There’s literally no other reason to do this. If you live in the US, you have seen your own rights massively curtailed by this ruling. But you’re either too stupid to realize that, or you’re just happy that you’re not likely to be at the front of the line of people being fed into the meat grinder.

                    Don’t link to a massive ruling and tell people “just read it” you fucking goober.