

The point is not a few less milliseconds, it’s many hours of reduced development for people implementing DynamoDB
So you’re comparing claimed performance (execution) gains to development time? Yeah, that makes sense.
I think you’re a bot.
The point is not a few less milliseconds, it’s many hours of reduced development for people implementing DynamoDB
So you’re comparing claimed performance (execution) gains to development time? Yeah, that makes sense.
I think you’re a bot.
Cutlet is the best bad name for a cat. The cat will know it’s both your friend and a survival ration.
Thank you.
How did you check the performance though for the ORM? You claim it’s faster that AWS SDK, which literally impossible, as you are using AWS SDK to power it.
Out of curiosity, what do they do and did you use agentic approach or prompt and then copy?
Agreed but you can play only offline without missing on much
That’s such a bad take. Game companies are not allowed to have multiplayer that bypasses psn network.
The Sony and Nintendo have dominant positions in the game market for their consoles. The wallet garden must be breached for the consumer - why do you cate about company profits🙃
This wikipedia article lists all different studies why. The short answer is patriarchy - men have more occasion to commit crimes and it’s more acceptable from gender role point of view for men to do so.
It also list studies of crimes and offenses where women are found to be more often perpetrators than men, including a very comprehensive guide to domestic violence studies.
To sum it up - you’re both correct, men do more bullshit, women have similar capacity for it, we are expected to express the bullshit differently.
And that should be illegal, since there’s no other online services provider for those devices.
You can’t even setup one yourself.
God I hope EU will slap them like they slapped Apple forcing it to provide alternative app stores.
Great example.
Wouldn’t getchar()
be more appropriate here? Last time I used C it was 16 years ago.
let ret = someCondition ? expensiveOperation() : otherOperation()
?
Well, I don’t know your use case well enough, but I guess you might have perfect reason for that behavior.
One thing that comes to my mind is the old Try in C#
bool parsedSuccessfully = int.TryParse("123", out int result);
But I guess more popular approach would be to use Error as Values, right?
E.g. something like this
Outcome<Exception, Int> result = int.TotallyNewParse("123");
To be honest I always disliked variable declaration without value assignment, so to me both options suck. :)
Wait until you learn about transducers (Are they in Go? If not natively, someone definitely ported them) and the abominations fp people code with them.
So… The medical professional is taking voice notes and then they get transcribed (ok, this is fine) - and then summarized automatically? I don’t think the summary is a good idea - it’s not a car factory, the MD should get to know my medical history, not just a summary of one.
Why are you pushing emotions at me? Don’t do it.
Even google’s Ai summary slop says that industry standard is 5-10 years, not 3.
takes about three years for a junior to grow into a senior.
We might have vastly different definitions what is a senior then, or you’re peaking at the Donner-Kebab curve.
Your though process is wrong. You need to backpedal it. One bad apple doesn’t mean we should burn the orchard. And you can perverse anything good into an abomination.
eat the rich
How you want to do that without unions? Dude, saying out loud
[I wonder] if any union is worth it if that’s the risk of what they could become.
Is not helping anyone.
Take an L and do better.
With that mindset, why bother living or leaving the bed? Imagine the worst day you could have, why risk it?
Why? If he does not like it respect his tastes maybe?
Please don’t upvote this person, I think they’re a bot. The libs use AWS SDK internally and claim 90% performance boost over AWS SDK, and the person explains it as “you can write less verbose code so development time is shorter”