100 billion messages per day and over half of them in groups apparently. It’s a lot, but 3 bytes per message is still not a lot of data. I’d guess they pack the metadata as tight as possible.

Orrrr they have a u8 chat_participant_id of some kind and a binary data format for message passing. The GROUP_CHAT_LIMIT const may have a bigger data type, but they may very well be trying to conserve 3 bytes per message. Ids can easily start at 0.

150 gigs of bandwidth saved per day doesn’t seem like a whole lot at their scale, but if they archive all the metadata, that’s over 50 terabytes a year saved on storage - multiplied by how many copies they have of their data. Still not a lot tbh, but if they also conserve data in every other place they can, they could be saving petabytes per year in storage.

Still weird because then they’d have to reuse ids when people leave, otherwise you could join and leave 255 times to disable a group lol

I reckon Rare must have given him a lot of creative freedom that he felt he might not get elsewhere. There’s ways to keep your employees for decades even in the modern software and games industries and it’s not pizza parties and calling your company a family. It’s letting long-time employees be decision-makers and rewarding them for the company’s successes.

Fair enough. Though in such a case (zero aftermarket parts availability), you’re better off getting a used part IMO, unless it’s a wear item. But that’s just my opinion of course.

Tl;dr: you’re technically right, but BEVs aren’t sustainable if you need to pay up front for the battery.

A 10-20k battery replacement on a car worth 30-40k used, for an example, is not “regular maintenance” though. And presumably it would come with a new 8 year warranty like the original battery does in every BEV, if you’re paying (financing) an OEM battery at the main dealer. Once the vehicle is older and worth less, there will hopefully be cheaper solutions

If BEVs and HEVs can’t easily do 20 years of service, we should just stop building them and go back to internal combustion full time. Fuck planned obsolescence.

To be clear I meant there should be government-backed low-interest credit programs for replacing expensive EV parts that would render the car scrap metal when they fail after 8 years and one month. Similar to how you can get student loans with a next-to-nothing interest rate because it’s government backed and they mandate a maximum interest rate and payment term. Because otherwise I’m going to trust a 25 year old pollution machine over an 8 year old BEV and that’s why there depreciating at a record rate.

You can have an Audi E-Tron for no money at all just a few years after it launched because nobody wants to be left holding the bag. I’ve owned ICE Audis, Mercs and BMWs with between 300k and 600k on the clock and had no issues that would leave me stranded, except for serpentine belts a couple of times because most of those were bought as poorly maintained vehicles in the first place. I have an easier time trusting a 20 year old car with 500k on it than a 5 year old BEV with 100k or even only 50k on it because I know if I can’t sell the 5 year old car before the battery warranty expires, I’m cooked. I’ve looked at BMW i5, MB EQE, Audi E-Tron, even the Porsche Taycan because they’ve all nicely depreciated now and I could justify them as a company car (saves me damn near 70% in pretax income compared to buying as a private person), but instead I’m keeping my privately owned 18 year old Diesel A6 because even on a company car I don’t want to be hit by a massive battery replacement cost and even if it’s a company car, I don’t want to buy new because fuck being hit by all that depreciation the first owner gets. But if I could get it at 4% APR for a year or 2, I’d be happy to replace an EV battery to keep it going if the rest of the car is solid and I get a good warranty.

Depends on the model. When my first car was having alternator trouble, I replaced the regulator which required me to remove a whopping two bolts. Of course it’s not possible on all alternators, but it was the first example I could think of. Similarly, if you’ve got a bad valve body in your auto transmission, most main dealers would tell you that you need to replace the entire transmission. Etc.

Tesla still makes the best EVs out of the American manufacturers I believe. They make really horrible cars though.

The big 3 are no better, but if Tesla had merged with a Japanese or European manufacturer that actually knows how to build great cars, it could’ve been something spectacular. A ridiculous market advantage.

Glad you no longer have it, but next time, regardless of manufacturer, if you have a minor issue that isn’t covered by warranty, don’t bother taking it to the dealer. They all scam you based on the hourly pricing (not competitive to independent shops, even specialists of the marque) and replacement policy (replace as big a part as possible because more money + less chance of customer coming back. Example for ICE based cars: Friend did his apprenticeship at a Toyota dealer. Car came in with a bad alternator voltage regulator (probably 20-30 euros for an aftermarket part, Toyota would obviously ask more for a genuine Toyota branded part), his boss told him it’s going to have to be a full alternator replacement, they won’t replace the regulator itself. This policy is great under warranty (you get more parts renewed, yay), but not so much when it’s an out of pocket repair.

I could see battery packs and motors being financable at a sensible interest rate being a good thing for people who can’t afford such expenses out of pocket - it would make it possible for slightly less well off people to buy used EVs instead of used ICE cars.

This though? Fuck everything about this.

Canada has its own problems for sure, but Ted Cruz’s family moved to Texas when he was 4. He’s definitely more a product of American culture than Canadian culture.

Is it? Comment above mine says that if the Brits showed up, they definitely genocided you. Mine says that it was only guaranteed to be genocide if you’re not white. The “might still be genocided if you’re white” part was left for the reader to infer, that was an error on my part, as it was a bit too subtle for no reason.

Here in Estonia (very white folks, we’re pretty far north), the Brits lent us a few ships the first time we broke free from Russian rule. So what I meant is if you’re white, they’ll occasionally help you (probably to get back at another empire), but if you’re colored, they’ll genocide you and take your land for sure.

Hoping it’s both but we all know the big colonies were given away because of revolutions, not out of their free will.

The British literally helped my extremely white people gain independence. They don’t always genocide white people is what I meant. They only sometimes genocide white people. They always genocide non-white people.

That’s a pretty small list tbh. Should be 0, but at least it’s not half of Africa and Asia anymore.

If the British showed up, they tried to genocide, that’s just what they do

I mean only if it’s non-white people. They’ve helped white people out sometimes - of course only when it’s aligned with their interests.

Okay, fair enough, I thought you meant just the user agent. Trouble with having a bot make it look like an actual user is looking at the data, is that it’s slow and inefficient. Trouble with paying humans to scrape the data is that it’s slow and inefficient. These companies want to ingest data ridiculously fast because there’s so much of it. If all else fails, they’ll resort to paying the content creators. But only if it’s data they really do think gives their model a competitive edge in some metric and they can’t pirate it. E.g I can see them paying for scientific research they can’t get from libgen, but not some rando’s blog post or local news website.

Does cloudflare still look at the agent? I thought they have more reliable data points.

You can if you’re Cloudflare.