

War crime is not a “skill”. It’s not a “tech advancement”. It’s something everyone a long ass fucking time ago decided was so inhumane that it shouldn’t be allowed. Russia’s war is illegal, Ukraine’s does not have to be.
War crime is not a “skill”. It’s not a “tech advancement”. It’s something everyone a long ass fucking time ago decided was so inhumane that it shouldn’t be allowed. Russia’s war is illegal, Ukraine’s does not have to be.
Ah okay then committing a warcrime is an enemy skill issue, maybe captured enemy soldiers should be skinned alive and fields should get dirty bombed and irradiated so you could comment “kek” on the post about it? Where exactly do you draw the line, because clearly not the geneva convention?
And more importantly Ukraine doesn’t need bad optics like this. This doesn’t look good from the outside.
I said we shouldn’t be sharing this and that is exactly what I think.
My apologies that “crying foul” over well established war crimes bothers you, but you’re not helping the Ukrainians by publicizing this.
You should not be sharing this, that is a war crime.
Lmao Zapatistas are still around and they were NOT on defence.
Lmao you’re drunk go home
Indeed, you’re bad, I’m glad you finally took the hint, troll.
Thank you for adding nothing to yet another exchange.
The literal day they became public they declared war. They also had a literal constitution and literal laws posted on the signs entering their territory, and you can be damn sure they had enforcers.
Complete legislative illiteracy like this is exactly why people don’t have any faith in the DNC. They got tons of shit done but people keep telling each other nothing ever happened and the uninformed believe it.
Also, social contracts are enforced in anarchy, just not by an entity emposed by a governing body.
This has yet to be demonstrated.
He’s the POTUS who brought the most real peace and had the most oversight on the military’s actions out of any POTUS there ever was.
In non anarchist countries they can be arrested and face trial, and there are many barriers in place to prevent them from taking total control in the first place.
In Anarchy it’s literally handed to them and the only recourse is to abduct or kill that guy.
That’s why nations last hundreds of years and Anarchies last days.
A power struggle with no legal recourse except bloodshed is indeed specific to a system where there is no power structure or system of laws, correct. That’s what I said. It has never once proven false. And you came in here and demanded I retract my statement? What are you going to do about it, eat my liver?
lmao
Do you think Apples wrote the definition of an Orchard?
What happens when it comes somebody’s turn and they decide to stay in charge permanently? Well obviously the loss of the social contract means that individual isn’t protected anymore, either, so they kill him. Just like the splicers tried to kill Andrew Ryan.
You’ll just have to sell your organs and work double shifts in the mines in order to pay for all the times the AI screws up your food order.