• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    And those were considered for use as “flying taxis” and they failed for the same reason these will: Flying and landing in cities is dangerous, which is why airports are built very far away.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s also expensive as fuck.

      Even if you have electric flying helicopters, the rotary component makes them very expensive to maintain as blades and components need to be replaced sometimes every 500 hours or less and require constant safety checks and inspections.

      Imagine how many taxi cabs have a malfunction of some sort every year. Now imagine that taxi cab crashing into a building or crowded street if it had a malfunction instead of just cruising to a halt on the side of the road.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      All the airports I can think of have people living near them. Several are inside major cities.

      Airports are quite large though.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        These drone cars won’t be cheap either.

        Because it costs a lot more energy to keep something in the air and move it forward, than it is to move it forward on the road.