• BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The risk is that they start suing users that act malicious, and this can’t be seen as malicious just incompetent.

      Edit: I don’t see users doing nothing as malicious. I’m talking about the one’s breaking stuff being sued.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Suing unpaid volunteers for not working hard enough? Not a lawyer, but surely you can’t use sue an employee for not working hard enough. Just do a really poor job, don’t moderate well. What are they going to argue?

          • Zetaphor@zemmy.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A lawsuit requires them to be breaking a law. Doing a shit or even malicious job at something you volunteered for is not against the law. Mods are not employees of reddit. If the argument is that they’re somehow harming the product, that same argument could be extended to the protestors and shitposters. It wouldn’t hold any water in an actual court.