Was just thinking that there should be doctor clubs, where a bunch of people pool their money to hire a dedicated general physician. Or to have a shared tailor, or group cafeteria, or whatever.

The ratio of people covered to specialists would probably determine whether it’s feasible. You’d want the specialist to still get paid a healthy (and guaranteed) salary and to have a more satisfying relationship with customers. And the members of the club to get better service / product than they would otherwise with middlemen taking a cut.

  • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Then cite something.

    https://www.rpc.senate.gov/policy-papers/medicare-for-all-higher-taxes-fewer-choices-longer-lines

    Here is a cite using the Democrat Medicare for all numbers. gasp! It shows 20% like all the other cites I have seen.

    You are the only one lying about cost. Your claim is that it will cost be less and it won’t. It won’t cost anyone less unless they don’t pay taxes. Otherwise, it will cost them more.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Are you talking about a single payer system? They often have co-pays and deductibles.

            • burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I don’t obfuscating the point. Neither you or I will be writing the damn single payer legislation. I’m not going to argue about random semantics.

              Single payer is cheaper than what we currently spend in the usa on health care. Period.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                It isn’t. You keep saying that but nobody agrees with you. I gave a cite that showed the democrats plans and all cost more. None show it being cheaper.

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Yet keep babbling but have yet cite Anything. I three different plans evaluated by an economist who weighs their economic impact.

                    Basically you have no clue what you’re telling about but keep making inaccurate claims.

        • burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t pay anything. I could have the one hundred per month plan and have the 250$ deductible as well or similar etc, but then my employer would be paying like 600-800 per month I believe so yours is actually more expensive as far as the whole system is concerned.