• T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says “reference” and let me know what you see? That’s not too much to ask, surely?

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?

      Last chance then I’ll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the “gay erasure” argument.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Last chance then I’ll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the “gay erasure” argument.

        It won’t be correct, plugging your ears, And closing your eyes isn’t “correctly assuming”

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you can’t provide a single piece of evidence to support your argument no matter how many times you’re asked, it’s correct to assume it doesn’t exist. Bye now :)

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If you can’t be bothered to look at the evidence provided then, no its not correct to assume it doesn’t exist lol.