• duchess@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Inkscape is great. A capable alternative to commercial products, unfortunately unlike GIMP.

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      GIMP dev are working hard, and things seems slow as they just redone the base to be more future proof.

    • Luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      As someone who uses GIMP very effectively for commercial work, I am increasingly feeling like people who say that GIMP isn’t a capable alternative are simply ignorant of it’s capabilities. Yeah, it doesn’t work like Photoshop. Yeah, it doesn’t work like Affinity Photo. Yeah, it doesn’t work like Photopea.

      But yeah, it does work, and works well. If you apply a bit of patience to learn how it works, then it’s also very easy to use, eventually. Maybe it doesn’t cover all the use-cases, but it’s ignorant to say that it categorically isn’t capable for commercial use.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I have never used any of those other softwares in more than a decade.

        I still only use GIMP for image editing out of principle.

        Still have to check every time for GIMP shortcuts because they are so counter intuitive. And there are so many counter intuitive things about it.

        IMHO it have the same issue that Libreoffice. It was really made decades ago and never really updated. It’s like that meme about workflows. In their efforts not to break workflows they have gotten behind in UX compared to other software.

        Also development seems to be stopping to a halt with each release compared to other more modern foss projects. I suppose it’s due an ancient codebase that’s probably really hard to work with.

        I use it. It can do a lot. But UX and development speed in GIMP is not up to par with projects like Krita, Inkscape or Blender (to name a few).

        Great software still. But I get why people complain about it.

    • 8000gnat@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      i have found gimp very intuitive over the years, but inkscape has left me totally be befuddled which is a shame because ad*be illustrator was my first digital design love

    • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Krita is nice. IDK how it compares to commercial products, but ctrl-c + ctrl-v works like you’d expect it to

  • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Finally boolean path effect supports holes!!!
    Aaaa, all the nondestructive editing you can do with this omg 🥹

  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Exciting, as always. I just hope they can eventually add CMYK support.

    I get color spaces are hard and there are workarounds involving Scribus, but I wonder if one could just have a custom SVG attribute that would be ignored by a standard SVG renderer (we’d have a similar placeholder RGB color, which we maybe would allow to be manually modified) and read by Inkscape when rendering to a format for print like PDF.