from 10b0t0mized: I miss the days when I had to go through a humiliation ritual before getting my questions answered.
Now days you can just ask your questions from an infinitely patient entity, AI is really terrible.
from 10b0t0mized: I miss the days when I had to go through a humiliation ritual before getting my questions answered.
Now days you can just ask your questions from an infinitely patient entity, AI is really terrible.
I think so. I am legitimately worried about what happens in 10 years with everyone relying on llms to code when nobody seems to be planning for how things will work when LLM coding is nearly universal
2005 post, s/LLM/Google/g.
there’s nothing to plan for. Shit will be broken, shit is already expected to be broken nowadays, business as usual. I hate what programming has become.
Do you realise what sub you’re in?
I do wonder if a new programming language will be invented that is ‘ai friendly’ and far more better integrated
imagine if there were a plethora of them already lurking out there in the deep?
isn’t it strange then that you don’t already have an AI overlord then?
The main concern for me is how that would even work. LLMs struggle to come up with anything truly novel, and are mostly copying from their training set. What happens when 99% of the training corpus for a programming language is AI code or at least partially AI code? Without human data to start with how do LLMs continue to get better? This is kind of an issue with everything LLMs do but especially programming.
I’m thinking more along the lines of a new programming language unlike any programming language ever made, simply made for an LLM to produce, like machine generation of machine code (but who knows, LLM’s in themselves are frankly magic to me, last thing I want to do is be like someone in the early 1900’s predicating in the year 2000 we’ll all use advanced hot air balloons to move about)
2035: BASIC supremacy.