Where Reddit differs among its tech peers is in its striking dependence on its user base to keep things operational. Reddit must keep its users satisfied and its efforts to expand its limited (and already unpopular) advertising formats could send users packing. 98% of Reddit’s revenue is made up of advertising income. And of that, 26% came from just 10 ad clients in 2023. Investors will be watching this closely and expect more diversity sooner rather than later
      • Empricorn@feddit.nlEnglish
        4·
        9 months ago

        Did any CEO do 193 million dollars worth of work last year? Almost certainly not, but who definitely did not? Spez. I think I’ll redirect my Internet traffic. I want to make sure I never, ever accidentally give that asshole any more unearned power, money, and fame…

        • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
          2·
          9 months ago

          Honestly, if one of reddit’s competitors tasked him with running reddit into the ground as effectively as possible, he’d be just about worth that figure by now.

  • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
    541·
    9 months ago

    If you are in the EU file a complaint with your supervisory authority as reddit is illegally processing and selling data of children to be trained with by Google, not to mention all other users who weren’t properly informed, nor consent retrieved. This one is going to be fun.

  • Ashtear@lemm.ee
    432·
    9 months ago

    The wild thing about last summer was it revealing how remarkably stable their unpaid labor pool is. Take away their tools, mock them in the national press and on the site, and the worst most of them will do is participate in a perfunctory protest. They weren’t willing to go to war or even organize in a meaningful manner.

    It makes me think of how nationalism has sent millions to their deaths. Who needs money? People will put themselves through hell just to protect an identity.

    • OpenStars@startrek.websiteEnglish
      4·
      9 months ago

      The users haven’t left, that’s for sure, but didn’t the mods of most of the larger subs (something like 48/50 I thought?) leave? Some unwillingly actually…

      But if you mean the enormously long tail of smaller subs, then yeah, that happened, fo sho.

      • Ashtear@lemm.ee
        0·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, mostly in terms of the day-to-day operations of the site remaining largely business as usual, at least in terms of what matters to corporate. Plenty of impotent response abounded, too. For example, one of the largest subreddits, /r/games, never even joined the 48-hour blackout.

        There’s an argument to be made that content quality is down, but that’s a subjective measure, and I’m not even going to try to unpack my own personal bias on that front given I moved here because of this in the first place.

        • Atyno@dmv.socialEnglish
          3·
          9 months ago

          I stayed awhile longer, but prepped for the worse that came yesterday.

          Honestly, I think it did impact the content objectively for the worse. Now that I’m fully moved into Lemmy I’m recognizing that a bunch of subreddits basically declined into irrelevance after the blackout (and I’m only remembering them as I try to recreate my subscription list here).

          And it kinda affected the vibe of the front page. As of now, I’d describe current reddit as very meta-naval gazing. So many of the posts are basically rival subreddits going “nuh-uh” and “yuh-huh” to each other. There may also be a new algo in use that’s basically encouraging fights between subreddits?

          Edit: I should clarify, I think there’s objectively less actual content with now the literal same content being posted multiple times but with different takes on it.

          • Ashtear@lemm.ee
            3·
            9 months ago

            I was mostly in the niche subreddits anyway, and it’s frustrating that Reddit is essentially still the only searchable website for non-sponsored content in hundreds (if not thousands) of niches. Quality in my niches is still the same ebb and flow that it was.

            There still are questions of validity, though. Message boards like Reddit haven’t really had their payola/Gamergate/astroturfed-FCC-comments moment yet.

    • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
      1·
      9 months ago

      I’m not sure how much moderators could even do.

      I was actually there so my view of events is pretty biased, but watching mods get removed from their position and replaced with more complying people made me think that the power dynamic was insurmountable. Regardless of how much free labor they perform, moderators don’t actually get bargaining power in return, Reddit employees untimately are above them to defend the company’s interests. Realistically, the function of a Reddit mod is to spare admins the grunt work of ground-level moderation decisions.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    39·
    9 months ago

    And of that, 26% came from just 10 ad clients in 2023.

    That’s interesting. Does anyone know which are those ad clients? It would be a shame if users were to shame them in public for advertising in a site full of nasty shit, like Reddit…

    The going rate for a content moderator around the world varies greatly, but for the sake of expedience, let’s say it might average around $50,000 a year. That’s $3 billion worth of free labor.

    …or if users publicly mocked Reddit jannies, oopsie moderators, working for free for a company that ridicules them as “landed gentry”…

    Reddit has a highly intriguing plan for counterbalancing these risks.

    “Intriguing” sounds like an euphemism for “experimental and with high chance to fail”.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      3·
      9 months ago

      “Intriguing” sounds like an euphemism for “experimental and with high chance to fail”. The flip side of the AI deal with google?

      They train on the dataset, reddit gets a free/cheap AI moderation system?

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        2·
        9 months ago

        Sounds like a bad deal.

        AI-only moderation simply doesn’t work - any sort of automated system can be easily circumvented, as users reverse engineer how it works. So you’d still need to rely on the fleshy jannies to not have the place imploding, except that those jannies already abuse the automod, so you’d have yet another system for them to abuse.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          0·
          9 months ago

          I never said it would be good moderation.
          But reddit saying to its shareholders “we have cut down our reliance on unreliable user’s free labour moderation by employing advanced state of the art AI moderation from Google specifically trained on our own content” is a big confidence booster, thus shares booster.
          Problem is, thats not what reddit is/was. Thats not the attraction of reddit.

          Good for the shareholders. Bad for the users. Likely short term profits for long term losses

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            1·
            9 months ago

            Sure, you never mentioned good moderation. But I don’t think that they’ll be able to exploit it - for investors risk assessment is bread-and-butter, and they know that anything “AI” might crash the following second. Plus the lower quality of the site would be visible as soon as they implemented AI moderators, generating even further risk almost immediately.

            I get your reasoning though - it doesn’t need to be good for the site, only passable enough for the suckers buying shares to trust it.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    28·
    9 months ago

    Jfc, I got the “invitation” for the IPO.

    If they’re sending it to me, the whole fucking thing is a bigger joke than I thought it was.

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    20·
    9 months ago

    I predict an initial IPO spike upwards (for maybe 2 weeks) to bait suckers.

    That will likely be followed by 2 years or more of bag holding 📉

    <Cue sad trombone music>

  • Sean@lemmy.world
    39·
    9 months ago

    Relax everyone. Reddit has been “in the works of an IPO” for like eight years.