• sky@codesink.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole point is being better than a human and they’re demonstrably not.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      they’re demonstrably not

      Wait… how did you arrive at this conclusion? Humans do this kind of thing all the time, too. You’d have to know the relative rates of accidents and mishaps to say with any confidence that they’re “demonstrably” not better than humans.

      • nous@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why look at overall statistics when you can cherry pick single instances to prove your point. /s