“This was not reckless driving. This was murder,” the judge said before she read out Mackenzie Shirilla’s verdict Monday afternoon.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    1 year ago

    The reason why they say this was murder:

    Two weeks before the crash, she allegedly threatened to crash her vehicle when she was driving with Russo because she was upset over a disagreement they had. Russo called his mother and asked to be picked up, and a friend ended up retrieving him. In a phone call with Russo, the friend allegedly overheard Shirilla say, “I will crash this car right now,” prosecutors said in court documents.

    This isn’t a drunk driver, or a thrillseeker, this is someone with murderous intent.

    • hh93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But doesn’t murder need intent? I think in Germany it would only count as murder if she was suicidal and absolutely wanted to kill the people in the vehicle. If the goal was to “just” crash it and destroy the vehicle but only harm everyone inside then it’s not murder by law (at least here)

          • Fuck_u_spez_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are cases of mutual murderer/suicide pacts where there’s shared responsibility and actions taken by each party but that wouldn’t have been possible when she was the only one in control of the car. Even if the boyfriend was suicidal, and there’s no reason to think he was from this article, the other passenger clearly wasn’t. IANAL either but I think that’s what the above comment was trying to get at.

          • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You can’t consent to murder, the best you could do is indemnify someone/an organisation against accidental death.

            • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t consent to murder

              Genuine question - why not? If someone wants to be murdered, for whatever reason, would that not be them consenting?

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why suicidal people are dangerous, it’s a relatively small change from killing yourself, to killing others.

        • zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is why pastry chefs are dangerous, it’s a relatively small change from baking your bread, to baking others.

          • Yepthatsme@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is why being baked while baking with a baker is dangerous. You get too baked and you might get baked by the baker for making bad cakes.

        • quicksand@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No there may be a small chance of collateral damage, such as this case. But suicidal thinking does not make you think of killing others. You’re clearly lucky enough to have never had suicidal ideation, but it never comes near the kind of thoughts that want to kill others