‘We Cannot Win’ Says Top Russian Commander Alexander Khodakovsky
www.kyivpost.com
The leader of the Russian battalion defeated at liberated Urozhaine calls for “freezing the front” after his unreinforced troops were devastated in a rout.

https://archive.li/Z0m5m

The Russian commander of the “Vostok” Battalion fighting in southern Ukraine said on Thursday that Ukraine will not be defeated and suggested that Russia freeze the war along current frontlines.

Alexander Khodakovsky made the candid concession yesterday on his Telegram channel after Russian forces, including his own troops, were devastatingly defeated by Ukrainian marines earlier this week at Urozhaine in the Zaporizhzhia-Donetsk regional border area.

“Can we bring down Ukraine militarily? Now and in the near future, no,” Khodakovsky, a former official of the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic, said yesterday.

“When I talk to myself about our destiny in this war, I mean that we will not crawl forward, like the [Ukrainians], turning everything into [destroyed] Bakhmuts in our path. And, I do not foresee the easy occupation of cities,” he said.

  • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    101·
    1 year ago

    you are very good at repeating slander ! We are very good in seeing through it …

    tell me why would you miss out on a “A leftie citing a Realist” and a “serial genocide denier larping as an Anarchist” sounds interesting … also its required from you, Your not a serious Person if and worth the discussion if “listening to the Dissent” is to much to ask for you …

    Imaging in a Court

    “the evidence is not relevant because it was filmed by a Japanse camera , and the Japanese are dirty , i will not watch this , Also take me Serious please !”

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      23·
      1 year ago

      Because the Soviets – rightly – decried geopolitical realism as imperialist apologia. You’re citing imperialist apologia. As a so-called leftist.

      And Chomsky denying genocides, do I really have to go into that?

      • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
        10·
        1 year ago

        Because the Soviets – rightly – decried geopolitical realism as imperialist apologia. You’re citing imperialist apologia. As a so-called leftist.

        what ? maybe actually concern yourself with the TOPIC… not with the Messanger ? Do you Think i am Vladimir Putin ? That i controll the Russian army ? I explaine to you “Russias Course” of action , I am not Russia , i am a Person explaining to you the Thoughts of Russia , BECAUSE THEY ARE RELEVENT TO THE SITUATION, Russia has a Full Strategic Array , World most advanced Nuclear and Missile Technology and Security council seat and hundreds of Tousends of Soldiers ,you are probably not even valued more then Medicine by your state , Russias Opinion is RELEVANT to the Situation they are way more relevent then your thought s and my thoughts … The Sowjet union is Dead , she Preached many great thinks we all love and miss her dearly …

        We are the “dirtbag” left , you dont scare or scold us with your purity fetish…

        And Chomsky denying genocides, do I really have to go into that

        which one ? Uigurs, Palestina or Great Replacementtheory … ?

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          22·
          1 year ago

          what ? maybe actually concern yourself with the TOPIC… not with the Messanger ?

          I linked you a video. Watch it. The issue with realism is not who spouts it but the way in which it frames international relations.

          which one ? Uigurs, Palestina or Great Replacementtheory … ?

          Cambodia, Yugoslavia, I think there were others but those I’m sure of. He later on did accept that the Red Khmer were assholes but still defended his prior judgement (“The CIA is evil so me saying killing fields were a CIA invention was warranted”), to this day so far as I know he’s still supporting Milosevic and denying Serbs erected concentration camps, were shelling civilians, suchlike.