A new federal ruling states human authorship remains an “essential part of a valid copyright claim”

  • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At that point, what is the point? These creative AI are being pushed to replace workers, not work with them. If you have to pay for the AI, and pay people, why not just save the money and use people?

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess for the same reason you pay for computers but still staff. It’s a force multiplier. I think we are still a bit of a ways off from total replacement but the force multiplier effect is something that can happen right now with current capabilities.

      • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps, but if workers know that so much of the work is being done by AI, I would think they would push for higher compensation since the money would otherwise go straight to the top.

        Granted that sort of bullshit has been going on since man invented money. But I think this might be the change where people finally realize how greedy people at the top really are.

        • Pseu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Workers will try, and some will win but many will lose. The company switching to AI assisted work is already going to be laying off a sizable portion of their workforce. If anything wages are going to go down due to the productivity gains as hiring will be easier.

          Now if workers have a strong and useful union, they might have the leverage to negotiate favorable terms. But without that, the benefits of technological capital does not go to the workers.