• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wasn’t the original usage talking about economies of scale potentially eliminating the need for things like owning a car, because things like Uber would be more efficient and cost effective?

    • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yes, from the WEF in particular. It’s such an inane idea that it drips with sarcasm even when sincere. They described a utility without any of the makings of a utility. I wish it hadn’t been adopted by right wingers and turned into a catchphrase.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s also been adopted by left wingers into some kind of threat, when it wasn’t meant to serve that purpose either.

        • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Left wingers as in hexbear or left wingers as in progressive voters? I haven’t heard it from either, but I’m rarely around anyone but the latter.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The kind of person who’s disillusioned with capitalism. Take that to mean whatever you like, but they’ll still use that quote in the wrong context.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yup, but of course everyone got greedy. Last time I used Uber I spent 70 dollars to go 4 miles. I learned my bus map immediately after that

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It was just an example, not a template, and it was more of an idealist projection of some better future based on where we were heading. You’re right that public transit is a far older invention that handles the job better in this case.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          oh agreed. You just made me chuckle because I remember the tech bros saying all of that back then, and how naiive I was for believing it.