• CheezyWeezle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Cool so I can come in to your house and steal all your shit, beat up your children, and shoot your dog, and you aren’t allowed to fight back because if it was justified, you wouldn’t need to?

    EDIT: I seem to have misinterpreted the comment, as you appear to be referring to conscription being unnecessary rather than the fighting. Taking the whole context of the comment supports that, but taking only the context of the final sentence makes it appear that you are saying “if fighting is justified you dont need to fight” rather than “if fighting is justified, conscription is unnecessary”

    • jackpot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      they mean ‘it’ as in conscription, thwyre saying if the fight was worth it you wouldnt need to conscript

      • conductor@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Correct, thanks. I guess I could’ve phrased it better but it was worth it for that dudes completely unhinged reply.