• Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Actually, their new AI thing is actually useful: stays on-device, and summarizes web pages and videos.

    But yes, they could stand to spend more money on the browser, and less on their CEO and other non-browser things.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah. Offline translation (i.e. that doesn’t send data to Google to translate), better screen reader functionality for blind people? Sign me the fuck up.

      People are just seeing “AI” and getting upset about it. Absolutely stupid.

      • Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll be honest, when I first heard that Mozilla had come out with an AI I figured it was on the back of them trying a couple different ad scenarios, and assumed the worst. Pleasantly surprised by Orbit.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        it’s a good idea to not look to deeply into the historic actions of the creator of llamafile. she’s pretty polarising.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            she was the face of the occupy wall street movement, but her views back then were more ancap than anti capital. while working for google she tried to petition the us government to shut itself down and hand the reins over to the tech industry, with google’s ceo as president.

            the base of the APE library that powers llamafile is called cosmopolitan libC, iirc in direct reference to the old soviet term.

            to give credit she’s mellowed out a lot in recent years.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t care who they are or what their Xitter history is.

          The tools is great, the tool is not backdoored. I ruthlessly use effective tools that I can get my hands on.

          Using open source software on its own does not even entails economic support for its creator.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            llamafile is not really “effective”. it’s incredibly impressive, but it’s the opposite of effective. it’s a collection of a bunch of hacks reliant on coincidences in OS design, and works by basically recompiling itself on the fly to work with different architectures.

            if you want effective, run llama.cpp compiled with actual optimizations for your platform.

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              By effective I mean, I downloaded one file, renamed it to .exe, ran it and now my shitty company laptop was running a basic LLM with actually lots of features, right then and there. I didn’t even have a GPU or admin privileges, and it just worked

              Sure, maybe it’s possible to squeeze more performance out of a 3 years old laptop, but that was actually very usable out of the box. And I didn’t even need to unbox it !

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We already have one. They’re called luddites. They’ve always existed, and will bemoan any new technological advancement.