• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    usually you invest in the main product to drive higher returns for diversifying. diversifying first means your baseline is unstable.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      During the google money years the ROI on Firefox was so mind-bogglingly high it would’ve been insanity to drop it all into the browser: It couldn’t possibly have soaked up the sheer amount of resources.

      Meanwhile, yes they did sink a large amount of resources into it in a way a profit-driven company never would have: They designed a whole fucking new programming language to get proper concurrency into the thing. Rust is, in a very real way, a language to write browsers in. That’s its purpose. And then they set the language free because, among other things, you can’t make money with it.

      Sure, lots of those investments tanked. But OTOH you have stuff like pocket which makes money and could probably keep the lights on by itself. If everything but pocket were to fail Mozilla absolutely would have to downsize, would definitely have to scale back its charity spending, rely more on the FLOSS community to actually write code, but it’d continue with the same kind of force as say Blender, which wouldn’t be what it is without its paid staff (both coders and artists) and sidle-hustles (commercial support, training, and cloud services, mostly. Oh, t-shirts and mugs. Don’t forget t-shirts and mugs).

      I guess overall the gripe I have with the “Mozilla should invest more in Firefox” chorus is that it implies “Do you want Mozilla to be way smaller and less capable of shaping the web than it currently is”. People have no sense of the scale of Mozilla, think that it’s running on donations etc.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          There’s a subscription if you want and they’re also earning some money off referrals. In 2022 they made ~80m dollars off all those side hustles, should probably be 100m by now. Selling the default search engine spot is still the biggest number, about 500m. And they have a piggy bank of over a billion.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            man, i haven’t thought about pocket for like 10 years. i remember being annoyed that they added yet another binary blob to the software.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              It’s not a blob the client is definitely open source, not sure about the server software but you’re not running that. It’s an extension like any other, just that it comes bundled with the default install and doesn’t use the usual extension enable/disable UI: Go to about:config, set extensions.pocket.enabled to false. It’s going to stay that way, this isn’t microsoft which likes to “fix” your settings.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                when moz first bought pocket and the extension was included by default, it was before they open-sourced it. this was in the NPAPI days when plugins could do basically anything on the host system. that shit got disabled the moment it touched my browser. same as the drm blob.