• finestnothing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They open sourced it, so it’s just a matter of time now. Linux is still a relatively small amount of their business though so they probably aren’t going to make it a priority in-house unfortunately. As a Linux user, I’m well aware that we’re still a vocal minority of users

  • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m still on google for email and a bit of drive, calendar etc. I’ve been reading stuff about Proton with some interest as I’d like to ditch google. This doesn’t encourage me - what’s the point of a mobile only plan? Isn’t half the point of a cloud drive to allow sharing with other platforms? I’m just thinking aloud here - I could go read their offerings where I’d probably find that it’s their lowest entry level tier and they have less restrictive plans with clients for various platforms?

    • GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      what’s the point of a mobile only plan?

      The plan can only be bought on mobile(through playstore and app store).

      Files are going to be accessible on all platforms.

          • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Bit of an odd statement. It’s not as if all Proton users are hardcore privacy fanatics who use custom ROMs on their phone

              • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                22 hours ago

                People that want a different storage/mail provider that isn’t Google, MS or Apple while still using the OS that came with the phone. Be it for privacy reasons or for not wanting to support their anticompetitive practices.

                • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  that isn’t Google, MS or Apple

                  You cant just say “companies that are not X, Y and Z” without further explanation. That doesn’t answer my question. People are not paying for something that is otherwise “free” for no reason.

  • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s nice to have the option, but I feel like 20GB doesn’t really do much. Especially if it’s for storing photos.

    It could be nice if they could set a $/GB price, so I could customise the amount of storage instead.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s for people who need more than 5GB but not 200GB. People in the developing world, or lower income brackets, who can’t afford 5-10 USD a month, or people who transfer photos offline instead of keeping their entire camera roll in the cloud.