RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoX fails to avoid Australia child safety fine by arguing Twitter doesn’t existarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1543arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1529arrow-down1external-linkX fails to avoid Australia child safety fine by arguing Twitter doesn’t existarstechnica.comRmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square50fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFireWire400@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·edit-21 month agoAs long as twitter.com redirects to X, it’s officially still called Twitter, I don’t care what Elmo says
minus-squareProx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-21 month agoWouldn’t the business license say still be for Twitter, with a DBA “X”?
minus-squareMisterFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoI’ve had a dig (I have no idea what I’m doing) but in this ASIC registry, seems to show they filed to try and wind up the company, and that was rejected? Again, not a lawyer. (See the “Documents” section) https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/panelSearch.jspx?searchText=647102672&searchType=OrgAndBusNm Edit to add: And they still have their trademark registered, so it clearly still exists haha how bizarre.
As long as twitter.com redirects to X, it’s officially still called Twitter, I don’t care what Elmo says
Wouldn’t the business license say still be for Twitter, with a DBA “X”?
I’ve had a dig (I have no idea what I’m doing) but in this ASIC registry, seems to show they filed to try and wind up the company, and that was rejected? Again, not a lawyer. (See the “Documents” section)
https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/panelSearch.jspx?searchText=647102672&searchType=OrgAndBusNm
Edit to add: And they still have their trademark registered, so it clearly still exists haha how bizarre.