https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/darn#Etymology_2

the government telling you that we are indeed fighting isis forces and not for oil

I thought this conversation was about whether students who don’t major in biology or chemistry will learn about evolution or the periodic table if the simplification was to proceed. Apparently, it wasn’t, being a duplicate of this instead.

It is still in the textbook and is taught in school. Source: I have a brother studying in 10th Grade.

As seen in this parent thread above and in the edit I made to the post about 4 hours ago, this simplification was axed a week after this article was published. (However, that didn’t stop Google from prioritizing outdated information.)

Thanks.

The article says that only students who choose to major in a subject will learn the information’s 11th and 12th grade subject textbooks. I don’t see how the textbooks themselves will tell me anything on Indian majors, especially textbooks from 10th grade and below. I feel like I’m missing something:

That doesn’t answer any of my questions.

What secondary sources do you propose we trust? Deutsche-Welle has a reputation for fact-checking and retractions. What’s your source that students who don’t major in math or biology will learn these?

sorry about that

as said below, that’s the last mandatory grade

This is Pythagorean theorem for the similarity of triangles

could you source that?

when i’m away from my computer’s compose key, i put the exponent after a term to do it in plain text, and would write the latter as 2a+2b=2c.

I was about to say this and how it went in the book. Do not give up our fight. If the world is full of darkness, then we shall be the burning light.

No/Yes/Yes

Why not?

However, the hacker(s) indicated, that should Schneider publicly admit to this latest data breach, the ransom would be cut in half. Thus, the ransom demanded would decrease to $62,500 worth of baguettes, we would presume. Even with a 50% deduction, that’s still a lot of dough.

firstly I was joking
secondly, cautious ≠ squeamish. we shouldn’t be setting masculinity as an example

energy is converted and never destroyed so it’s true

WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS TOM SCOTT SLANDER

are you okay

If your concern was that I didn’t qualify the headline’s area of interest, I just did that. The headline was from the TechCrunch article this link post goes to.

Could you clarify what you mean by my description not matching the study nor title?