Aedis

Oh. Missed that lol.

It won’t but you also won’t be disappointed by it if you never play them!

GDPR doesn’t just protect PII, it also protects user Generated Content.

This doesn’t make that behavior any less scummy, but have you tried using any Google website on a browser that isn’t chrome?

So your logic is that since we already have some toxic we should just go ahead and make it more toxic?

It’s actually much simpler than that. Latino is just someone living in the US that is a descendent of someone from Latin America.

The term might extend to people living in other countries other than the US by now, but the definition is similar.

I didn’t see this one in the list, but UNN newscast from Starcraft 2 is one of my favorites! Particularly Donny Vermillion.

Sure, the CDC, the NIH and the WHO are some sources. But what about a source that has information about what people are encountering?

Ok, where do I get distilled news and incidents regarding covid and other infectious diseases/viruses spreading?

https://xkcd.com/1814/

Cool and all… But why did you have to post this over and over in a gajillion subs?

The answer to “is it part of the activityPub spec?” is more often than not a strong No.

Wait he didn’t invent him? Man… I

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villian something something.

At least what I see with this experiment/article is that is overly verbose, he takes a long time to get to the point. And then when he does his methodology shows an experiment that cannot be verified. Even when something is “subjective” we can still draw conclusions from it if we set up proper non-subjective ways of evaluating the results we see (ie. Rubrics). The fact that he doesn’t really say what leads him to say in detail what is a “terrible/v. bad/bad/good result” is a massive red flag in his method.

After seeing that, I no longer read the rest of it. Any conclusions drawn from a flawed methodology are inherently fallacies or hearsay.

If in any case it is further explained in the article and that somehow refutes what I’ve postulated later on, then I would have to say that the article is poorly written.

All this to say… I agree with you, not worth the read.

What? Ballmer hasn’t had anything to do with msft since 2014 man.

Software engineer here, but not llm expert. I want to address one of the questions you had there.

Why doesn’t it occasionally respond with a hundred thousand word response? Many of the texts it’s trained on are longer than it’s usual responses.

An llm like chatgpt does some rudimentary level of pattern matching when it analyzes training data. So this is why it won’t generate a giant blurb of text unless you ask it to.

Let’s say for example one of its training inputs is a transcription of a conversation. That will be tagged “conversation” by a person. Then it will see that tag when analyzing hundreds of input texts that are conversations. Finally, the training algorithm writes down that “conversation” have responses of 1-2 sentences with x% likelyhood because that’s what the transcripts did. Now if another of the training sets is “best selling novels” it’ll store that “best selling novels have” responses" that are very long.

Chatgpt will probably insert a couple of tokens before your question to help it figure out what it’s supposed to respond: “respond to the user as if you are in a casual conversation”

This will make the model more likely to output small answers rather than giving you a giant wall of text. However it is still possible for the model to respond with a giant wall of text if you ask something that would contradict the original instructions. (hence why jailbreaking models is possible)