This is the real disconnect. As long as executives’ pay are related to profits or stock prices, they will never make safety the #1 priority.

He doesn’t give the math of what he’s spending now vs with a heat pump, and he doesn’t say he CAN’T afford it, just that it will take too long for him to see the financial benefits. When others try to ask him about details, he doesn’t respond.

The whole reason why we’re in this mess is the full cost of carbon is not paid by current consumers used to cheap energy. People need to accept that their western standard of living will be reduced to match the correct cost of these comforts without taking a sort of “carbon loan” for the future generations to pay.

It’s a very hard pill to swallow, I understand.

Sorry I thought everybody here understood personal sacrifices will need to be made in order to solve the climate change problem. Apparently not, we just like to blame corporations for selling us the things we demand (like gas heating)

“I don’t want to help at all unless I can see immediate personal financial benefits”

That’s what you sound like

The entire article is just an ad for a blog that doesn’t exist yet… The irony is unbearable.

Seems like a simple answer to vote for the one that’s 10% better

Asking users to Opt out as a method to replace an Opt in TOS is a trick because they are hoping users won’t see it. If they sent an email asking users to click a link to Opt in to the new TOS, that would be OK.

I hate it when people act dumb like this. You know why it’s an issue because of the opt out instead of the normal opt in.

If the tech caused the crash, then absolutely yes