![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Interesting contribution from the obvious Nazi
Interesting contribution from the obvious Nazi
???
Isn’t this the guy America is sending to imperialism Haiti again?
Does “condemned” mean “expelled” or “told not to get caught” in British?
It’s on the landing page, in the third “recent rulings” that helpfully even has Trump in the name, but go on.
Removed by mod
If he hadn’t assaulted her he might have been able to make her pay his dry cleaning bill.
You can stop pretending to be a JAQing off American, btw. You outed yourself to all the native speakers.
Removed by mod
Like you read it regardless.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Transcripts are posted after rulings.
Or you could just read one of the many, many, many articles quoting her dissent.
Or watch a video quoting her.
That’s the dissent’s warning.
I guess the surviving members of the Court can reopen the question!
“As an official act as President, I have issued an Executive Order that I blast Trump in the face.”
Boom, checkmate libruls
The Overton window describes movement on a political axis by views held palatable to the public but does not reject the concept of objective definitions of “right” or “left.”
For example, the Overton Window would imply that there were right, left, and center Nazi party members. And there are, in the frame of the Fucking Nazis, but that doesn’t make a “left” Nazi an actual socialist.
Saying “Macron isn’t center” can be taken as an objective assessment of his politics. And it’s correct. He is not a centrist. Who don’t actually fucking exist anyways, but whatever.
So, basically, OP is saying you’re playing the fascists’ game when you let them define politics by relativism instead of objectivity. Bowing to the terminology of the Overton eventually leads to arguing about which “centrist Nazi” you find most palatable.
I’ll take the red fascist mobo for use in the Second American Civil War, np
Relatively cheap virtue signalling (most of them are dead) with a side goal of reminding people the Holocaust happened and that’s why Israel gets to do genocides.
No, because he’s a coward and an appeaser.
Btw, your cope that it has to be the President specifically doing the acts is disagreed with by Sonya Sotomayor in her dissent where she states outright that this decision makes political assassination legal.
But you’d know the implications better than a SC Justice who works with the fascist members of the Court, right?
Simply do not consent to JoJo
Here’s a hint: stop editorializing when you’re JAQing it. Makes it a little obvious.