The only feasible restriction should be to just keep them behind the pharmacy counter. Only to allow the pharmacist to advise on the best most effective and safest use.
The only feasible restriction should be to just keep them behind the pharmacy counter. Only to allow the pharmacist to advise on the best most effective and safest use.
One of the worse parts is that they may soon have the only delivery ward in their area.
Then… Wouldn’t they not be able to pass through the door?
To be perfectly honest, I imagine the US government would see it as too big of a risk to just let him go without at least some sort of shadow watching and following his every move, ready to pounce the second he sneezes wrong. This would be if they were to let him leave.
Granted, it would all be speculation, but the possibility does exist.
I recently found an ad requiring knowledge of win2000/XP
Well, hunger can cause a tummy ache
Holding the power button for 1 second also opens the menu.
I’d just go for a “feature” that disables the on/off function (leaving the momentary function alone) of the hi-beam when a sensor/s detects light above a certain luminosity. I also think an extra cost to the registration could be tacked on for vehicles that are lifted or otherwise have headlights above a certain height that would scale with the said height.
The best method (including Soylent) is adding 2.5-4cm (1"1.5") of water to the shaker bottle, adding the powder, tapping the bottle on the counter a couple times, then topping off with water. Once filled, replace the top, give it a good shake, let it sit for a minute or two, and then give it a final shake to get the last bit off the side.
This method prevents the powder from sticking to the inside edge around the base or to the top and reduces the shaking needed. If you’re really hungry, with Soylent, you can actually use up to 105g (3.5 scoops) of powder in the standard sized shaker bottle and it will still mix properly if you finish adding water after replacing the top to a little below the flip-cap opening.
Having the pivot point (steering) for the front wheel behind it’s axle helps
I see those as good, pretty much only if you are hurting for cash while being unemployed and looking. (And given that most if not all states in the US are at-will, you can resign when you find a better position.)
Overhead?
I know from working in manufacturing, at least, that people like to abuse excel and try to use it as a DB client
Win11 didn’t even know what to do with my Intel (of all brands) WiFi chip.
Win10, Kubuntu, and mint all detected it without needing to download and transfer the driver with my phone in order to start the updates after install.
CBD was unfortunately on the ban list when he got in trouble. It was only just removed a decade later in 2019.
It’s also one of the few chemicals in cannabis that can affect performance, unlike THC which just bugs me. Like they are almost picking and choosing, purely to just be finicky
I would say that rule should only apply to purposefully taking something for an unfair advantage to juke the competition, like most steroids.
For the ones where the only reported reasoning is being harmful to the user or has a potential for abuse, I would say the decision be on a case by case basis.
My reasoning is that there are also people who’ve turned their lives around and quit the substances in question. Being banned when you are fully “legit” would be extremely demotivational and can increase relapsing. It could also be controversial to one of the ideals of the Olympics; overcoming adversity to be the best you can be.
I’d be more afraid of an aggressive cat over an aggressive dog. The latter are usually easier to trick and can hopefully be herded to somewhere where they can be trapped. Cats however…
Funding and fewer patients it seems.
https://www.times-standard.com/2024/08/22/mad-river-to-halt-birth-services-in-october-st-joseph-hospital-is-only-labor-services-in-4000-square-mile-area/