A closed loop story creates consistency.

Groundhog loops are different each loop

Time travel

Looper

Donnie darko

Next

Bill and Ted

Time loops

Source code

Palm springs

Yes. Except for the last 1/4.

It has already happened

Tea bricks were the preferred form of currency over metallic coins for the nomads of Mongolia and Siberia. The tea could not only be used as money and eaten as food in times of hunger but also brewed as allegedly beneficial medicine for treating coughs and colds. Until World War II, tea bricks were still used as a form of edible currency in Siberia

Money can be anything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania

A detailed and well reasoned response. Thanks!

This will boost the American job market and increase manufacturing ability.

These tariffs create American jobs and long term boosts American skills and manufacturing abilities.

You only get money if you do what the lobbyists (not the voters) want.

What is the incentive for the democratic party to ever chase votes rather than money?

This is definitely a repost.

Maybe being roughly screwed for 4 years is better than being gently screwed for 12+ years by a party that argues in court that it doesn’t have to follow any voting rules because it is a private corporation.

The DNC unilaterally presented Harris who received 20% less votes than Biden in 2020. Non-voters have sent a clear message that it is the DNCs fault.

Section 1466A of Title 18, United States Code, makes it illegal for any person to knowingly produce, distribute, receive, or possess with intent to transfer or distribute visual representations, such as drawings, cartoons, or paintings that appear to depict minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are deemed obscene.

Which seems fine in spirit, but we don’t really want the letter of the law making something like this

O/-<

illegal

Academic research is the standard that should be aimed for. References and no opinions.

Yes, it is possible to fact check with integrity. Not like this example.

Opinions should not enter into fact checking as opinions are not fact.

In this case the job of these people is clearly to perform damage limitation for the WEF

This is why fact checks are bullshit. Reuters admits that

a WEF social media video from 2016 that stated eight predictions about the world in 2030, including: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy. What you want you’ll rent, and it’ll be delivered by drone.”

Now to make the statement false they bring in a strawman “Stated goal” condition and prove that particular part to be false, then claim that makes the whole thing false.

Such bullshit.

What I was fishing for. Thanks.

I vote John von Neumann for tech savant.

Utopia (UK 2 season version)

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_jIDr2tZiuRHlp-bLwYNgWaFAp6dR7_Y

Chatgpt is decidedly unerotic in its responses.