Reverse umbrellas are the best. Hands down.
Reverse umbrellas are the best. Hands down.
I mean, I generally agree with your assessment, but elite dangerous? I love Elite, but it is not a good game. Best thing to come from Elite Dangerous is the community.
I like the first one. The second might require a little more processing power than Trumpers typically have at their disposal.
First, have they ever presented good evidence of anything?
Second, who would they present it to? There’s no governmental agency or regulatory body in charge of disqualifying for insurrection. The only precedent we have for this is Confederates trying to run for office after the civil war, but that precedent got botched.
10/10 condescending attitude tho
Looks weird from my side too, when someone starts frothing at the mouth about monopolies when steam is so much as mentioned.
You know what, I appreciate the call-out. I don’t trust our economy, and shouldn’t reference it in defense of one (in my experience) honorably led company.
I thoroughly enjoy it as a game. It’s better with friends though, as some games tend to be.
I like Imperium a lot, but I’m so bad at it lol
I feel like too many people sleep on this game. It’s so good
Those fees are multi-industry standard though.
Sponsored results make me irrationally angry and push me to Kagi every time I see them.
Didn’t a solar flare just hit us today? I assume that’s the reason
I like kagi. I wish it weren’t a fourteen step process just to have it be the default when I search in the URL bar.
Dunno why you’re being downvoted, that’s hella funny
Yeah, the ear-blast videos take a full two or three seconds to register that I’m hitting the volume button. Tinnitus hit me like a train
Any time an android phone I own gets older than, say, a year, the volume controls get more and more sluggish. I feel like it’s a form of planned obsolescence, but I haven’t ever heard of anyone else talking about it.
You are correct, I too tend to humanize LLMs to some degree.
FYI the only source listed anywhere in the article is Bard itself. This journalist seems to just interview an LLM and take the outputs as fact.
Public service announcement: this article seems to be written like their only source was asking Bard some questions. If you trust Bard enough to tell you Google’s plans, you may as well be asking it when the second coming is happening, because it’ll be just as confident when it hallucinates that answer too.
So the concept of a space designated for one thing doesn’t make any sense to you? Like at all?