𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙

Troll honeypot, apparently.

Suggested blocks:

  • @lemm.ee:
    • @ByteWizard (troll)
    • @Texas_Hangover (troll)
  • @lemmy.world:
    • @neflubaguzzi (troll)
    • @fkn (troll mod)
    • @jopepa (troll)
    • @yggstyle
    • @EdibleFriend (troll)
  • @lemmy.blahaj.zone:
    • @nublug (troll)
    • @StoneGender (troll)
  • 0 Posts
  • 238 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2023

help-circle










  • But actions have consequences, so he doesn’t, even if it might be the “better” course of action for humanity if he did.

    1. We can be critical of is action or inaction.
    2. These consequences are mythical and not relevant. I mean, do you think everyone’s going to just up and leave catholocism (good luck, literally no one can stop being a catholic, to the extent that their religion means anything)? Do you think they will take over the vatican? Do you think they will start sinning in other ways, like killing one another? Do you think catholics would go against what the pope has told them God has commanded?, really? I don’t. What am I missing here?

    Because it wouldn’t be the best course for his organization (at least from his perspective).

    Because it’s his opinion, because he (*[via] God [or whatever]) sets the rules. You know what, I’ll write him about this. I realize he’s got other archdiocese reading and responding to him but as a catholic it’s one of my rights. I am all for meeting people where they are at, but… it’s all but saying it, and until he does say it, he’s just giving people a way to win arguments claiming that homosexuality is a sin, making everyone their own lawyer trying to interpret what the pope is saying.

    If this were a politician trying to sway congress that’s one thing, but is the vatican not functionally a dictatorship, with the pope at the top?