I suppose it’s “confusing perspective” worthy.
I suppose it’s “confusing perspective” worthy.
Then I hope it won’t get any traction.
I hope this is a joke and not intended to be real.
Done airlines give you outside views, but shoot with potatoes. So it’s better not having that. Also there is nothing to see at most of the cruise height.
I want to see the 10x hamsters!
Google is the maintainer and biggest contributor to chromium.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_(web_browser) and they’ve already introduced wei into chromium without any pushback.
https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/255346/Google-is-already-pushing-WEI-DRM-Webpage-into-Chromium
There are forks of chromium already like Vivaldi. You can still use them. Unfortunately using them is not a guarantee that Google can’t use their usage numbers as leverage while politicing or advertising bad behaviour to other parties like social media.
Worse yet, maintaining a fork is a huge undertaking for a project in the size of chromium. This means in time the fork may struggle to keep up. Or upstream may introduce functions that depends on the bad behaviours and the fork be forced to either adopt both, or adopt none.
And that’s the problem. It gives full control power to Google. That’s the reason that popularity needs to be broken.
Shots fired! Shots fired!
It’s not the real issue. I introduced that while anonymizing the data. It’s that a 3-5 liner code became a huge switch case by just incrementing the code and never thinking how it should be done. This was caused by like 15 engineers in time :)
Something like below would be huge improvement:
subs1 = ["cluster1", "cluster2"]
if subs1.contains(clusterName) return subs1
Totally unrelated, these second black circles on the people in the background 🤣