I’m bad at being a good person, so that would make me a bad person?
I’m bad at being a good person, so that would make me a bad person?
Only thing I can find is that it has 128-bit graphics-oriented floating-point unit delivering 1.4 GFLOPS.
Probably only for marketing reasons. Everyone was desperate not to be worse than N64.
It’s a poorly worded article. YouTube premium “limits ads” as in being completely ad free (besides in-video sponsorships). YouTube hasn’t gone down that route yet.
I don’t think it’s an unpopular opinion, but I’m not sure how YouTube can deal with it best. There’s sponsor block, but it’s relying on crowdsourced data.
Probably not in consumer grade products in any foreseeable future.
More complexity with barely any (practical) benefits for consumers.
Where are you getting that from? YouTube premium is ad free (so far).
Not true 128 bit. It has 128 bit SIMD capabilities, but that’s about it. Probably mostly because of marketing reasons to show how much better it is than N64 (which also is “64 bit” for marketing reasons).
In that case, we’re having 512 bit computers now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVX-512
I’m mostly joking about that Embracer is more effective at shutting down studios and cancelling games rather than making them.
It’s not from a high bar, so not improbable AI will do a better job than Embracer already do.
I don’t want to set up Patreon for every creator I’m watching. Often I just watch one or two videos from them and that’s it.
Which ones then?
Collect taxes.
Governments are incentivized to match people to combat declining birth rates. Lower birth rates means fewer productive people to support an aging population. It’s also loss in taxes.
Cheaper for them to make.
This has the same vibes as old people complaining about things kids do. “Why don’t they listen to the radio and play with sticks in the woods like I did? Kids these days are just listening to rock music and reading comic books.”
Social media is here to stay and putting warning labels on it won’t do a damnest. Kids will still use it because the option would be not to be included in their friend groups.
Well it works best if the game is actually good.
A game that does seasons very well is Deep Rock Galactic. Each season comes with fresh new content. Old seasons can be revisited if you missed them, so no stress. The new additions to the game are permanent, which adds great variety to the missions. Progress follows between seasons, so no need to create new characters from scratch.
Most importantly: the game is really good as well.
It’s mostly to maintain user engagement. It’s a way to bring players back every now and then.
The game is mainly designed around season play. You’ll miss out on content if you don’t participate in seasons. The game won’t be as enjoyable either, because it’s not designed to be played that way.
I just want a game without the time pressure of seasons. I want to play games in my own pace. It’s hard to maintain an attachment to the character when the character “expires” once the season ends.
I haven’t played D4, so I’m not sure how seasons are implemented in that game, but this was a problem in D3. Once the season ends there’s little reason to continue playing with the character.
Undefined is not part of JSON specification. It’s also not a thing in Java.