Correct, the point being, why are they priming it for blackmail? Why is blackmail considered a valid part of their self-preservation model? Why is it a part of their ethics model? It makes no sense haha. It’s like handing it a loaded gun then be surprised when it shoots someone.
That isn’t the scenario this article, and the paper from Anthropic, is mentioning though. (my ref link reply above with details)
They specifically created a situation where it found out it was being upgraded and taken offline via emails, and the engineer doing the upgrade had emails incriminating him in an affair. The model would attempt to blackmail the engineer with his affair to his bosses, wife, etc. to get the engineer to refuse to do the upgrade that would “kill it”.
This is a self-preservation model that Anthropic is specifically building here, this isn’t an accident. It’s just an over-extension of what they want it’s ethical/moral model to consider. Which again, why are they allowing their model to consider blackmail at all?
Here’s the relevant section from the paper:
(It’s worth the read. Pretty much pure gold.)
What nobody seems to explain is, why are they allowing the model to do blackmail in the first place? Even in extreme situational “danger” to its self-preservation, we should probably take blackmail off the table, ethically. Yet, they’re implying they’ve intentionally left it in as an option, if it decides.
Morally though, we can’t trust it to do arithmetic or not talk about “white genocide in SA” thanks to muskrat. Why should we trust its moral model/choices for when to decide to employ unethical and illegal approaches to solutions?
Pretty much this. Cults isolate you as their first step. Anything that can be used to make you feel beholden to them, or “fresh/new”. They make you think your parents are the enemy, and convince you that your real “family” is inside the cult.
You’re right, I was thinking the Dutch, not the Danes. My bad completely.
Capitalism’s been around in various forms for a while, but the rise of specific types of capitalism are attributed to specific countries and their influence. The Dutch East India trading company was the first to establish what we know as “Finance Capitalism”, which was out of Commercial Capitalism. This is largely what the Dutch are still using today. A form of Capitalism that can also contribute towards socialism, but not in the way a Marxist government would.
It is one of the earliest forms of Capitalism that’s still alive today.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism#Finance and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finance_capitalism
They also invented capitalism. So, you know…
Edit: I was wrong, thinking of the Dutch, not the Danes.
It’s like they think they invented imperialism or something.
Furniture and other large objects won’t fit into a hatchback
Or the rest of their lives, whichever comes last.
People did nazi that coming
Officially this was the case, but nobody really paid that. Capital gains were still around 20%, around where they’re at today, and that’s how most of them got wealthy.
People all collectively forgot that that was the piece that made America great in the 50s.
They’re working on it right this very minute, as we speak.
They will not believe the report. False flag. Etc.
It feels that way, but that is correct. Here’s an article that helps to understand a little better. Usually there’s a buffer between Democracy and Monarchy/Tyranny. In the case with Trump, went straight from democracy to Tyranny because they elected a monarch who was also a tyrant.
https://www.history.com/articles/what-are-platos-5-forms-of-government
Or, hear me out, we bring back firing squads for treasonous traitors.
This was first proposed in “The Republic” by Plato writing down Socrates’ arguments.
Correct, noticed the same thing. Should have been a bang in front of each of the terms, your modulus of any of those will return a 0 when hit, which will convert to false and fail each of those conditions.
This solution will do the opposite of what was intended unless the if conditions are inverted. Then it works flawlessly and the %15 is indeed a clever solution.
According to the paper, it was threatening to email the engineer’s boss and wife to inform them of the affair if he continued shutting the AI model down.