![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/56b875b2-16e7-404c-9df1-f1343f095591.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
I only know that I was pleasantly surprised how well GNOME ran on a surface device of a friend.
Ich mag Pflanzen und hab ein extra Regal dafür. Support your FOSS (Free and OpenSource Software) projects!🫶🏼
I only know that I was pleasantly surprised how well GNOME ran on a surface device of a friend.
Once a detector is good, you can train a model to adjust its outputs to cause false negatives from the detector. Then the cycle repeats. It’s a cat and mouse game basically.
The only proper way I see is a system that is based ob cryptographic signatures. This ia easier said than done ofc.
Explain please. What’s the true meaning and what’s the intended one?
“Radio night, here I come”
instead of
“Ready or not, here I come”
If they post it on a non-google platform, they only gonna reach people that already don’t use Google…
Haven’t seen InnerTune mentioned yet: https://f-droid.org/packages/com.zionhuang.music/
Good Spotify alternative for me.
Why downvote him? He made an observation and comments even explained why. I learned something, it added to the discussion.
This seems to be extremely region and country dependent! 😅 Where I live (Germany, large city), tinder is very popular and not among “old, ugly” people for sure.
The toolbar padding looks weird (top padding too low) and the toolbar key size is too small as well. But all in all totally usable alternative.
And OMG I love the glide typing it just works 🫠
I agree. Especially as the app is already 20 MB in size… 1.5MB wouldn’t make much difference IMO.
Speaks to the fact that we apparently need better and new alternatives or make current tools easier to use.
Certain aspects of discord seem to resonate with people (unfortunately…).
Man pages are great as mentioned, but maybe not as accessible to some people. Are there tools to generate more convenient resources (e.g. wikis) from that? Similar to how generating technical documentations from (structured) code comments.
Dolphines are whales. People keep doubting me, whenever I bring that up :D
Do you know why?
Just use a VPN bro and you’re fine /s
Hello, as I said, it’s about “security by design”, which means to design a system that ‘doesn’t allow for insecure things’ in the first place. Like a microwave oven doesn’t operate when the door is open. IT-/cyber-security is a complex field, but 2FA is a good place to start, regarding user facing services. There are lots more things than that of course.
That’s exactly right. I was about to say how people usually don’t even “not take it seriously” but rather don’t even think or know about it. But you already said that yourself haha :D
The lions share IMHO is at 23&me. Offering such a poorly secured service is negligence, in the face of the data’s high sensitivity nature.
This shouldn’t be “offered” IMHO, this should be mandatory. Yes, people are very ignorant about cyber security (I’ve studied in this field, trust me, I know). But the answer isn’t to put the responsibility on the user! It is to design products and services which are secure by design.
If someone is actually able to crack accounts via brute-forcing common passwords, you did not design a secure service/product.
[Edit: spelling]
Made me think of this YouTube video :) Also check out the comments for more examples.