Oh, basically the moment I’ve learned that many school shooters are autistic and I’m likely autistic, I started joking on that subject.

I mean, it (still) feels funny. Not that autistic people are braver (often seems the opposite), we just fear different things than NT generally. So what NT people (especially kids, especially in an environment prone to bullying) fear is not what we fear.

I know those terms. I wanted to edit it, but was too lazy. You still did understand what I meant, right?

We don’t call a shell script “AI” after all, and we do call those models that, while for your definition there shouldn’t be any difference.

The real Skype was fine.

This Skype, I think, is just an ugly version of Teams.

Someone in here has once linked me a scientific article about how today’s “AI” are basically one level below what they need to be anything like an AI. A bit like the difference between exponent and Ackermann function, but I really forgot what that was all about.

Is WoW still that popular though?..

No. You are damn fucking well illustrating what I said, though.

This doesn’t make any sense.

Ahem, well, there are obvious things - that 2x2 modulo 3 is 1, that some vaccines might be bad, that’s why farma industry regulations exist, that pi is also unknown p multiplied by unknown i or some number encoded as ‘pi’ string.

These all matter for language models, do they not?

And you want an Ai that doesn’t offend these folks / is taught based on their output. What use could that be of?

It is already taught on their output among other things.

But I personally don’t think this leads anywhere.

Somebody someplace decided it’s a genial idea to extrapolate text, because humans communicate their thoughts via text, so it’s something that can be used for machines.

Humans don’t just communicate.

Thx, also the whole idea, I think, is presented better in Tao Te Ching.

You haven’t made any preposterous claims about my supposedly existing theories on climate change.

You don’t learn, do you?

My theories?

I mean, this is an example. A liberal trying to start an argument with saying things that are false, but in his opinion will lead to something good.

It would be the same with liberal talking points and in general any human talking point.

Humans try to change the reality the way they want it, thus things they say are always incorrect. When they want to increase something, they make it appear less than IRL, usually. Also appearances are not universal.

Humans also simplify things acceptably for one subject, but not for another.

Humans also don’t know what “correct information” is.

A lot of philosophy connected to language starts mattering, when your main approach to “AI” is text extrapolation.

Alternative facts, alternative liftoff, alternative attack, alternative growth, alternative survival

(It’s just a joke in Russia about state media using the word “negative” instead of alternative is similar cases to describe things falling apart)

Boris Johnson also knows a thing or two about homoerotic stuff, UK good schools and all.

They say people had fun in Daggerfall.

They’ll likely want specialists from the one that does. Hence the culture.

Either Armenia or Azerbaijan could host it, Armenia endorsed Azerbaijan in exchange for them releasing another portion of hostages (the 2020 ceasefire agreement says that all PoWs must be released, so they are hostages ; and of course people captured after that are).

So in this particular case, apparently, kickbacks did not play a significant role. Which is actually rare for Azerbaijan.

Maybe they’re hoping for a “This is what your country will look like if everyone continues to ignore this problem” reaction from the attendees?

Not necessarily hoping, but this is a useful effect actually.

I like Taiwan (I admire China as a civilization, and the democratic part of it especially), but chip production should be decentralized.

Bleeding edge is good and all, but there are plenty of applications where you don’t need anything near bleeding edge. While centralized production means centralization around one specific chain of countries involved in that production. A major center somewhere else would most likely have a different chain. A few major centers - even more. That would create redundancy and improve competitiveness.

Ukraine’s were Russian honest word.

They had a lot of nukes, shouldn’t have given them all to Russia. It was a case of western pressure btw. Not having too many nuclear powers and all that.