Wether Jesus was referring to the gate or not kind of doesn’t matter, since it was followed with the comment “With man it is impossible, but not with God. For all things are possible with God.” Basically meant a rich man could never do it on his own.

Great wealth corrupts people. Jesus did say that even rich people can be saved though. But only with the power of God.

Perfect example.

1. The rich man loved his wealth more.
2. “And Jesus, looking at him, loved him…” He didn’t whip him and tell him to leave, he loved him.

Jesus didn’t talk about wealth inequality in that way, as far as wealth being bad. His point was that the wealthy tend to think they have it all and are in need of nothing. Mostly that the richer you are, the more you love money than God.

He wasn’t just flipping tables and whipping wealthy people. They were at the temple making money off of selling animals to sacrifice for sins. They had made a business of selling indulgences basically, that was the issue.

OK, I guess when I watched the video earlier today it was brighter and I couldn’t see it as well. It looked like a badge was maybe in his hand as he walked towards her, but I can see now that it wasn’t. It does look like the others pull there badges out though, and have them hanging from their necks as they approach.

I just find it better, to do a little research on formulas, and figuring it out yourself. You’ll become better at spreadsheets. I’d have to try it though, it would depend on the actual implementation of it.

Well, it does look like he shows her his badge as he’s walking up to her. The mask thing is weird though.

Exactly.

As i said before, I don’t know if it should have taken place or not, I don’t know enough of the background story.

People get arrested all the time who haven’t committed a crime (which does not mean you have been found guilty yet). It’s not considered kidnapping. And it does look like he shows his badge before going for her phone. And no, I don’t think this was gone about correctly.

I don’t know the back story so I’m not commenting on if she should have been taken in or not.

I wasn’t commenting on whether it should have or not, just on the way it was executed.

I agree, it doesn’t seem to have been done the way it should have been.

Its just that based on the title I was expecting a van to drive up, open the door, shove her in, and drive off.

Microsoft Office is adding in AI? Spreadsheets can take a lot of work to create, I can just imaging an AI tool going in the messing one little thing up, and it being near impossible to find the error. Or not even know your calculations aren’t being done the way you want.

I expected it to be more violent based on the title. They actually, went up and explained to her what was happening. At the same time, it did seem kind of odd the way it was done, like they weren’t professionals at this.

Agreed.

Or maybe a cult of personality has you captured, preventing you from being able to see it from both sides point of view as I am doing.

You don’t have to agree with the other side in order to see it from their perspective.

From the article, sounds like they would only be using money made from the sale of the gold they already have. Basically, not spending any extra money, and in the end, just converting some gold to bitcoin. I’m not sure how the sale of gold certificates work.

You know what, the first time, I totally read your comment completely different than how you meant it. So my previous reply would have been different.

Even so, my comment was not disgusting, it was just using logic.

This line in the article made it sound like it already exists:

“This move, according to Hines, could be a budget-neutral way to increase the country’s Bitcoin reserves.”

The US has a bitcoin reserve? First I’ve heard of it. Whatever, but using gold to buy it makes no sense.