Inspired by the linked XKCD. Using 60% instead of 50% because that’s an easy filter to apply on rottentomatoes.

I’ll go first: I think “Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows” was awesome, from the plot to the characters ,and especially how they used screen-play to highlight how Sherlocks head works in these absurd ways.

  • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just looked up Event Horizon and it only got a 33%. I love that movie. It genuinely really creeped me out. Few horror films do.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As always, it has to be kept in mind how the RT scores work. It doesn’t aggregate scores, it just aggregates if the review is positive or negative.

        A movie with hundred critics saying “Yeah, the movie is fine I guess” will score higher than a movie with 90 of those critics saying “This is the best movie I’ve ever seen!” and 10 of them not really feeling it.

        The concept of mass critic aggregation also just has fundamental problems compared to following and learning the tastes of a specific critic, in order to evaluate their review.

        • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is a horror movie so that could put a lot of folks off, especially with some of the imagery. That’s one of my favorites but just a theory on why others may not like it.

      • ShustOne@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love the dismissal of critics as a while because a movie you like scored low. It’s a good creepy movie but it’s no that good of a movie overall. It’s very cheesy, the dialogue is poor, the story is minimal. It’s got great creeps though.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I watched that thinking it was just sci-fi while high as a kite in my teens.

      I’m still not over it.

      A+

      • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My bro-in-law and I sat down to watch it thinking we’d get a good laugh out of it. After it was done, we just sat there for a while in silence.

    • biofaust@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That is absurd! Event Horizon is the only legit Doom movie. That was the idea all along and they even used the sound clip from the spawn cube in the movie.

      Also, although I am not a 40k fan, I know some people see this as a prequel to Warhammer 40k as the moment in which humans first get to use the Warp.

      It was ruined by execs, but it is a masterpiece, especially in the production design.

    • Mighty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? I still hold that movie as the scariest thing I’ve ever seen. It grips me just thinking about some scenes. It’s an amazing movie. Can’t believe the score

    • Bonifratz@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good choice. For all the flaws the film might have, it perfectly accomplishes what it sets out to do: it genuinely fucking scares you.

    • worldsayshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I remember feeling like that about “the Sphere” which came out the year after and has 13% on rotten tomatoes. I really liked it.

  • khan_shot_1st@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Sure it’s campy and way over the top. But I kinda like it for that. Plus the characters are awesome, the designs were pretty cool, and Sean Connery was great. Currently at 17% on rt.

    • Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I genuinely loved that movie. Watched it as a kid, got the DVD as I got older, downloaded the torrent when I was in college, watched it with friends for movie nights.

      I had no idea it was supposed to be bad! I loved the weird fusion of camp, bizarre situations, and genuine action. Although I did have to chuckle at one of the reviews criticizing its CGI, written twelve years after the movie came out.

    • kboy101222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, it’s not a great movie, but it’s definitely fun enough to warrant more than a 17%

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dammit, you can’t submerge the Nautilus in Venice’s Grand Canal! It’s only a few meters deep!

    • emptyother@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was great up until the last 15 minutes, I remember. And it was beautifully artful. But I was a bit colored by the comics, the villain and his motives was just so much better there.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    Constantine - 46%

    Predator - 34%

    Ghost in the Shell - 43%

    Hellboy - 17%

    Robocop (2016) - 49%

    Well, it seems like I have poor taste in movies after all.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I don’t understand why it doesn’t get a lot more attention as one of the early solidly made comic book movies.

      • emptyother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Loved the characters, but the movie plot felt like a clipshow of a bigger plot that didn’t fit into 2 hours. I haven’t watched the anime but it probably was.

        • drewofdoom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s exactly what it was. They just lifted their favorite parts from multiple different iterations of the story. The original movie and the original TV show, mainly. But those two don’t even canonically fit together.

          It was a jumbled mess and it sucked. The original anime, its sequel, and the original TV show are all fantastic, however.

        • grtz@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Watch the anime, everything that was great in the 2016 version is a bow to the “original”. And I actually think Johansson was a great cast for the film. The way she moves is so totally Major Kusanagi.

      • emptyother@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I loved Ron Perlman’s Hellboy, but the Hellboy 2019 movie was the best. Felt more like a comicbook pulp story and less of a 2000-ish action comedy. But the public and critics has spoken; if it ain’t a standard superhero action comedy flick, it is a “soulless” reboot.

        • fubo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          David Harbour had the potential to be a better Hellboy than Perlman, but the rest of the movie was … really not very good – in pacing, characters, or effects.

          If you want a mash-up horror movie that’s more fun than the critics said, go for the 2004 Van Helsing.

          • emptyother@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I loved Van Helsing. It was seriously brain dead entertainment but action was great and the effects were good. I loved The Brothers Grimm, that came out the year after, better though. Horror movie, comedy, action. I passed that movie over back then because of the critics, so took a few more years until I actually got to see it.

    • Amilo1591@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Predator came out in 1986 I think. But I totally agree about Constantine and Robocop 2016, I liked those a lot.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. Robocop 2016 is so good. I get that it’s different, and it’s reboot no one asked for.

        But it’s also a solid movie.

      • TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe they’re referring to “The Predator” from 2018 (because why should movies have logical titles) where the aliens are here to

        spoiler

        harvest autism from our children before climate change destroys humanity.

        I wish I were joking.

        • Quazatron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was not aware of that. Oh dear, that sounds like the kind of plot studio execs would come up with in the 80’s while high on coke, except they are all woke now.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I lived Hellboy, and 83% of people can suck it.

      And Constantine… I could watch that movie monthly for the foreseeable future and be happy.

  • LikeMike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Grandma’s Boy is a perfect stoner comedy. Featuring Nick Swardson in a hilarious breakout performance. RT can kiss 15% of my ass.

  • Riker_Maneuver@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hook with it’s 29% tomatometer rating. Dustin Hoffman—sexual misconduct allegations aside—fucking nailed it as Hook, and I think the general concept of an adult Peter Pan returning was pretty cool. Also, who doesn’t love Robin Williams? It was a movie I loved in my childhood so I am absolutely biased, but 29% seems absurd. I still find the “Don’t try to stop me, Smee” scene hilarious to this day.

  • Ashtear@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tend to like sci-fi in this category such as Stargate, Dune (1984), and the Riddick films.

    TRON Legacy is my favorite of the bunch, however. Incredible soundtrack, gorgeous costume design, and plenty of character.

    • h34d@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stargate, Dune (1984), and the Riddick films

      I like those too, in particular Dune and the Chronicles of Riddick, but they all have audience scores above 60% (and Stargate and Dune are from the last millennium if we’re sticking to that requirement).

    • flatpandisk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really liked Tron Legacy. I keep hearing the next one in the works so cautiously awaiting to see what they release next.

        • wavebeam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t Daft Punk break up last year? I guess I would suggest not even bothering with considering hopes at this point.

          • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            yup. Although with the amount of people wanting to see them in the movie, it’s possible that they still might do it with enough cash, err I mean incentives

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I loved the film, but I can’t think too hard about it. I treat it like a really long music video. It was such a fun watch.

    • Roundcat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      TRON Legacy is one of those movies where I watch it purely for its visuals and music. It’s a let down in terms of story and action, but I stop everything to look at it when its on.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wanted to like TRON: Legacy. I didn’t.

      There’s one reason the original TRON wouldn’t play today, and it’s not the 1980s fake computer graphics. It’s the pacing. TRON is slow. There’s no jitter. It looks like a 1980s video game, not a 21st-century video game.

      Or, really, just contrast the Wendy Carlos score with the Daft Punk one. The original is majestic swoops through a digital dreamscape, not jitterbug pop for robot dancers.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A thought that may help you enjoy Tron: Legacy - The pacing and style changes are meant to represent the changes in computer technology and specifically gaming, between the eras when the two films came out.

        In TRON, there’s a mechanistic pacing that reflects the early computer clock cycles.

        In TRON: Legacy, there’s a lot of imagery and plotting around characters trying to find peace, or achieve slowness, or even just rythm - trying to escape the attention starved modern algorithm.

  • improvisedbuttplug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chappie (32%)

    I love that movie and have seen it several times. Directed by Noel Blompkamp (District 9) and starring Die Antwoord.

    It’s extremely original and entertaining sci fi.

  • jaschen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Idiocracy is one of my favorite movies. When it came out, it was far below 50%, but after some of the things on the movie started becoming true, it became popular.

    • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you like the movie I recommend picking up the novelization. It’s a slightly different version of the script in a couple places but it does an amazing job of filling in a lot of details and how the magic works, and some stuff that was cut from the movie (the half breed demon Constantine is in a relationship with, etc).

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of critique I saw for it was squarely aimed at Keanu Reeves. Early 00s popular opinion was he doesn’t act and plays the same character in every movie, with monotone voice and muted expressions. Quality cast with lots of talent, special effects for the time that were at least on par with what was popular for the years prior to it, and a story that keeps twisting and turning it felt like the lore was being made up as it went, which was confusing to more casual audiences who maybe were hoping for a Matrix spin off given Keuna was starring. And of course it being attacked by the religious conservative crowd for using Christian themes and twisting them to be satanic, completely missing the point of the movie.

        On the other hand, fans of the comics and character of Constantine were equally upset that Keanu was starring, and while he managed to be mouthy and snarky, it wasn’t to the level they were hoping for (this shouldn’t have been a surprise given that Spider-Man in the comics is also known for his mouth while the live adaption at the time had him being fairly quiet.) So they blasted the movie for just being a rip off or Hollywood water downed imitation for what was otherwise a very adult and out there character who has more tricks up his sleeve than batman.

        Personally, thought the movie was great and loved it, I can understand the critisms but the fact that the movie got made at all was a small miracle and that it turned out as well as it did with the climax being a rather memorable scene with John giving Lucifer the finger.

        • dirtySourdough@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fair criticism towards Keanu I suppose but I thought it fit his character. Plus the supporting cast was great, as you noted, so I didn’t notice as much personally.

          I never read the comics so I didn’t have that context. I can appreciate that viewpoint though. I would probably prefer a character that’s more similar to the comics if I had read them.

          Ultimately I agree with you. All the twists and turns with a great ending made for a very enjoyable movie.