Fans customized the Wicked movie poster to more closely match the original Broadway poster.

Original Broadway Poster:

Movie poster:

Some fans, disappointed by the poster, altered it to be closer to the original, moving Grande’s hand and lowering the brim of Erivo’s hat to cover her eyes. The edits prompted Erivo to respond. “This is the wildest, most offensive thing I have seen

“None of this is funny. None of it is cute. It degrades me. It degrades us,” Erivo continued. “The original poster is an ILLUSTRATION. I am a real life human being, who chose to look right down the barrel of the camera to you, the viewer… because, without words we communicate with our eyes.”

So, this seems like a completely reasonable reaction to fans making fan content.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    fanart is valid.

    she is not “making demands”.

    The actor is telling people that it hurts her for them to erase her face from the poster.

    “She’s literally playing a fantasy witch who has already been played by dozens of other actresses.”

    that does not make this actor less of a person who deserves basic courtesy and respect.

    “She’s the only one out of all of the previous ones to get upset about this.”

    being erased is upsetting. she is allowed to be upset.

    “If she wants to be noticed for her face, then playing an iconic villain who has been played so many times before isn’t her place to be”

    victim blaming.

    Just play the character, we don’t care who you are.

    shameful.

    “She is new to the franchise”

    you should still respect her feelings.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Her feelings are unjustified and come off as narcissistic. I would be more open to the idea that she was being erased if she wasn’t on literally every other poster for the movie. Fans made a poster that they felt more closely resembles the original poster from the franchise that was made over 20 years ago. To assume anything else is a very large stretch.

      For her to react this negatively over a fan making their own version of a poster says a great deal more about her, and to me does more damage to her reputation than a poster ever could.

      There are literally entire sites and databases dedicated to fan generated poster art. The entire Harry Potter series has thousands of posters that don’t include the actors faces and are based off the books. Are those “erasing” the actors? Have we seen Ian mckellan go on a tirade because fans made a two towers poster that doesn’t include his face? No, because it’s not about them and they don’t care.

      If her feelings are hurt over one tiny person making a poster that doesn’t include her face then that’s her problem she needs to tackle herself, not dump on the people who were excited to see her play elphaba.

      So yeah. I’m not accepting the victim blaming title because i don’t see her as a victim. She made herself a victim in her own mind when one fan did this. You know who I see as the victim? The fan who was probably really excited to see this movie, so excited they made their own poster, and then had the Hollywood celebrity call them out publicly who now has people like you defending her for basically calling this person (who again all we know is just a super big Wicked fan) basically the devil

      Literally all she had to do was nothing and it would have passed with no one noticing.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Her feelings are unjustified and come off as narcissistic.”

        her own feelings are justified and not subject to your or anyone’s approval.

        her feelings are justified.

        they come off as narcissistic only to you because you do not see her as deserving of feelings.

        this is your problem, not hers.

        “For her to react this negatively over a fan making their own version of a poster says a great deal more about her, and to me does more damage to her reputation than a poster ever could.”

        her reaction does not invalidate her feelings or her basic humanity, both of which you are shamefully dismissing as irrelevant.

        “Have we seen Ian mckellan go on a tirade because fans made a two towers poster that doesn’t include his face?”

        this situation is about a different person, Cynthia erivo, whose feelings were hurt, not Ian, whose feelings were not hurt.

        “that’s her problem she needs to tackle herself,”

        she is. she is explaining her feelings to the public, which as an actor is very natural.

        she isn’t attacking other people, she didn’t “dump on the people”, she is explaining how she was hurt and how this feels to her, personally.

        read her statement, you apparently have no idea what it says.

        “now has people like you defending her for basically calling this person (who again all we know is just a super big Wicked fan) basically the devil.”

        neither erivo in her statement nor i here have called the creator " basically the devil" or attacked this person at all, in any way.

        we’re talking about the feelings of Cynthia, and her basic humanity, which you are shamefully dismissing as irrelevant.

        there was no attack in this statement, it is an explanation of how she feels as a result of being erased from a work she cares about.

        you don’t respect and are dismissing her perspective, feelings and her right to express her feelings, which is offensive and shameful of you.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Correct. I dismiss her feelings. We’re just going in circles now. I dismiss her feelings, because they are something again that she needs to deal with, not me, not her audience. She said what she wanted to say, I say that she was wrong and vain to do so. Her simply “having feelings” does not make her suddenly perfect and right. She was wrong jump to conclusions that she was being erased. She was wrong to call out a fan who just made a poster and assume that they were doing it as a personal slight. She was petty for not just ignoring the thing and moving on with her life. Those are all of my feelings, does that make me right too? We can all have our own feelings, and we’ve evolved a bit into being allowed to express them. However the same adage applies, my freedom ends where my fist ends and your face begins. Same thing here. Her feelings are valid - internally. Making them public like this exposes her to criticism, which I now have a lot of. If she didn’t want that criticism she was welcome to not say anything.

          Being critical of someone does not remove their humanity.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            2 months ago

            “Being critical of someone does not remove their humanity”

            I don’t think anybody told you it did.

            saying that someone’s feelings are not valid?

            that is dehumanizing.

            “Those are all of my feelings, does that make me right too?”

            you’re still missing the point. it doesn’t matter how right or wrong you were, your feelings are valid and should be respected, particularly if, instead of how you are characterizing Cynthia, she is nearly expressing how she feels so that people are aware of how erasing her makes her feel.

            “Her feelings are valid - internally. Making them public like this exposes her to criticism”

            criticizing her and trying to invalidate her experiences only dehumanizes you, not her.

            her feelings are valid.

            you don’t like it, that’s valid too.

            but it does not invalidate her feelings just because you value her less than you value yourself.

            The same selfish problem everyone else complaining about her merely expressing herself has.

        • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean, if it’s shameful to not empathize with someone over the slight of their face being partially covered in a movie poster, then I’ll accept that. Your disdain of people means nothing to me.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            '…means nothing to me."

            I can tell by how invested you are in this post that you don’t care at all.

            “…if it’s shameful to not empathize with someone…”

            It’s not shameful to “not empathize with someone”, you’re the one that made that up.

            it is shameful for you to invalidate someone’s feelings; that dehumanizes them.

            • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not invested in anything other than to point out your outrage is just pissing in the wind here. And I don’t care what you think so telling me I’m shameful means nothing to me.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                my outrage?

                i was not feeling any outrage, you might want to pat your pockets for a more local source of indignant frustration.

                “I’m not interested…And I don’t care what you think”

                You are so “not invested” and “don’t care what [i] think” so much that you’re jumping into a 2-day old post to offer up your ideas on the matter to me specifically.

                • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I mean, it’s a minute of my day to tell you simply that you shaking your fist at people who don’t share your outrage is pointless. I’m really not invested other than to keep engaging you to point out how silly this is. Up to you when you want to stop.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    any outrage you’re feeling is your own.

                    I’m not “shaking my fist”, I’m pointing out that people are objectively wrong about what Cynthia has said, and that saying her feelings are not valid is dehumanizing.

                    treating her as a person seems to make you people very upset.

                    “I’m really not invested ither than…”

                    restarting an old post to declare your devotion to relitigating how one person doesn’t deserve to have feelings or express themselves, but other people do.

                    "… point out how silly this is.*

                    The thread you took the time to start? I agree.